college green/ o’connell street plaza and pedestrians
- This topic has 683 replies, 83 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 6 months ago by
missarchi.
- AuthorPosts
- August 25, 2008 at 9:50 am #746332
Rory W
ParticipantI’m sure it’ll be as effective as the banning of cars along the stretch of Pearse Street between Tara st Junction and college street – was walking there last week and counted 6 private cars along this strech (not taxi’s or hackneys either) in the short time that it talkes to walk it – no enforcement as per usual
August 25, 2008 at 12:14 pm #746333ctesiphon
ParticipantIf only there were a Garda Station in the vicinity…
(Or, at least, one from which the view wasn’t blocked by a double line of parked cars.)
August 30, 2008 at 2:19 am #746334GrahamH
ParticipantMore fresh thinking from Busman. The one dispute would be the chosen locations for all the bus termini – St. Stephen’s Green, Parnell Square and Merrion Street – the very places you least need ranks of buses compromising spaces. Nonetheless the latter two both feature secondary areas which would be more accommodating.
@SunnyDub wrote:
I fear your College Green Platz idea is hopefully unrealistic, at least in the short-term, I think it’s more Picadilly Circus than a quiet pedestrian zone.
College Green can be whatever we want it to be. There are no rules, only guiding principles from elsewhere which can be pick n mixed at will. Equally apathetic resignation, or appeasing of transport authorities will also not result in the best outcome for this place. An urban framework plan with a clear vision as Peter has mentioned takes priority, by all accounts acknowledging different transport scenarios. But a defined strategy that protects the integrity of this critical civic space first and foremost is required before any decisions are made about transport. It would be entirely unacceptable, and so typical of Irish planning, if College Green was merely landscaped as a left over token incidental space after the transport engineers have had their way.
I had gathered together a series of photographs on College Green and College Street, but accidentally deleted the lot, but frankly it was just a rant anyway so no loss. Also it was simply so depressing taking them that I couldn’t actually put myself through it all again. Coupled with a wander around the area last evening, as well as typical passing through on a near daily basis, it really is crushing to see how much the main throughfares of Dublin city centre have degenerated over the past few years. All of that boom and nothing to show for it on any of the main streets except O’Connell Street. In fact it’s so depressing I’m beginning to avoid the Westmoreland/D’Olier/College Green axis for the more heartening aspect of the quays. Frankly it’s a dump to walk through, and horrifically congested with pedestrians at peak times. It’s worse than sittng on the M50 with the amount of waiting bus patrons and tourists wandering aimlessly around without a sole attraction in the entire area save Carrolls tack merchants. It’s sickening to see the current white elephant of the Docklands and campshires (all perfectly valid in the longer term) receiving such investment with barely a soul gracing their acres of new landscaping, while the city core quite literally rots, Save an emptying of bins and the odd pavement sweeper, the public domain is completely untended. This cringe-inducingly embarrassing scene has been like this for months on end, in high summer. It is an absolute scandal.

What on earth does this say to visitors about how we hold ourselves in regard, never mind the city itself. The ground around here is also constantly littered with bank receipts, vomit (as people congregate here after dark), litter left by the homeless, and other general filth. One cannot be anything but mortified at the standards that are tolerated in the presentation of this city. There’s no point dredging through all the issues – we all know what they are, from public domain, buildings to retail uses, and all as important as each other. But the more these standards are tolerated, and these largely in prestigious and watertight legally binding Architectural Conservation and Special Planning Control Areas, the more it breeds and contaminates adjacent streets. We can see Dame Street beginning to lose its grip on quality uses already, and even the sniff of the potential of Lidl on College Green merely confirms this trend. The latest addition as mentioned before is this delightful number right opposite City Hall and Dublin Castle, the very origin of the city.

There have been so many objections to this place in all its previous guises, unmaterialed and otherwise, over the past few years it’s really quite remarkable. And yet in spite of all their planning issues, and multiple and highly prescriptive conditions, the likes of this still goes on in the most historic part of the city.

Cheap off the shelf aluminium frames, multiple useless doors, postering everywhere, fit-out exposed to the street. sandwich boards all over the pavement, ‘temporary’ signage, cheap lighting and exposed electrical conduiting, and already rusting upper balcony…

And the wider building, while crisp and a decent contemporary interpretation of adjacent structures (as stipulated by planners, can you imagine what it was like before) was still allowed away with terrible factory fenestration and crude devices designed for maximum interior rentability. I mean this is basic basic stuff.

And then the banner crops up advertising cash conversions…
An excellent submission was made by a Cherie Flynn on a very recent application for an off licence in this unit. It’s worth reading as she sums up a number of issues facing the area at large. Apparently Supermacs have been sniffing around the Burton building, which says it all really.
August 30, 2008 at 7:42 pm #746335Anonymous
InactiveI don’t wish to hog a learned architectural forum with matters of buses, but the matter of putting the buses somewhere is vital to the whole picture. At present we are discussing running trams through the most congested bottleneck in the city, and to ask where the buses might go, will be answered with the retort that the buses are ‘outside the remit’ of the RPA. Dublin Bus, for their part, will enter any discussions on the basis of maintaining their self appointed ‘squatters rights’ on the city streets for the past eighty years. Look at all the shiny new bus stops going up, while the buses sit in the same old traffic jams, with the same old tram stages to denote the fares. Dublin Bus are not planning on vacating any time soon!
Independent Bus Terminals
I apologise for suggesting Parnell Square as a city terminus. On ‘mature reflection,’ of course, it is totally unnecessary. We have Summerhill Garage, which I visualise as being vacated by Dublin Bus, and taken over either by the city council, an independent transport regulator, or an independent private agency, to be operated as a combined bus terminal and passenger interchange, with cleaning, fueling and dormitory facilities for both the city bus operators, private or state, and also for visiting coach drivers, on long distance or private charter work. Those facilities outside of the basic bus terminal would be charged to bus operators on a reasonable basis, with discounted fuel, canteen, etc. All on street parking by buses would then be subject to heavy parking fines, rigorously enforced. That will get your parked buses removed from Mountjoy Square.I see part of Donnybrook Garage providing a similar facility on the southside, and Conyngham Road Garage providing that facility for the west side. I wonder if Conyngham Road were a bus terminal, could some bridging facility be provided across to Heuston Station, either for the buses, or for intending passengers? Or perhaps CIE land at the back of Heuston would serve that role. Another interchange is planned for Strand Street, although I question the access to that for buses, and for Connolly.
Bus Garaging Outside the City
More bus garaging needs to be provided on the perimeter of the city, with buses operating from these perimeter depots, INTO and then OUT of the city. City terminals would then be just that, for disgorging, loading, and departing. Operators should be penalised for holding up terminal space. I am sure you don’t just park aeroplanes haphazardly round the apron at Dublin Airport!I have looked at the frequencies of all the Dublin Bus routes, and the frequencies on the key corridors across the city. Having appropriated terminal facilities as suggested, on an INDEPENDENTLY operated basis, not beholden to any one bus company, the other priorities would be to organise new corridors across the city, allowing for the ingress of new tram lines.
Street Closures
O’Connell Street, College Green and Westmoreland Street would be lost to the buses. Those buses cannot simply be supplanted to Gardiner Street or Capel Street. It takes more thought than that. Dame Street too, if there are to be trams, will lose at least half it’s capacity, suggesting that what is left would be a one way street.I see O’Connell Street, Westmoreland Street and College Green open for loading purposes only perhaps overnight. I would see tour buses and perhaps one centrally serving route (the single deck electric buses of my previous post) that links the main interchanges, but does not cross the canal.
New One Way Streets
I see Nassau Street, Suffolk Street, Church Lane, Dame Street and Lord Edward Street reduced to a ONE WAY corridor WEST bound, preferably with bus only daytime access between Dawson Street and Trinity Street. I see South Great Georges Street and Aungier Street become a ONE WAY street, SOUTH bound as far as Redmond’s Hill. This creates a much more freely operating bus circuit from Earlsfort Terrace to Kildare Street (rerouted NORTH bound) through Nassau Street, Dame Street and Georges Street, back towards the main southside arteries. I would see set down only stops at St. Stephens Green, Kildare Street, Nassau Street and Dame Street, with pick up ONLY in Dame Street. Remember, these bus routes would be intended to enter the city, run the circuit, and exit again as quickly as possible. There is nowhere available on this circuit for the laying over of buses, without resulting in congestion and inefficient operation.Cross City Services
There is scope for cross city buses to use Winetavern Street to the Quays northbound, returning via Parliament Street, and for Westland Row both ways to be used as well. I would prefer to see less cross city services, but more user friendly availability of interchange between buses. For example, why not terminate the very busy 46A bus corridor at Leeson Street Upper, with an interchange stop there for cross city routes heading towards each of the northside N1, N2, N3 and N4 corridors? Peak hour buses could be allowed to run on into the Nassau Street / Dame Street circuit already described, for SET DOWN only. The Burlington would serve as an ideal interchange for buses coming FROM the city to interchange with buses bound for the N11. It can be done efficiently, and if less buses were to cross the city half empty, stuck in traffic, then the interchange would be enabled quicker than one bus can presently do the entire route, stuck in the endless traffic jams.Dublin City Council
Unfortunately, the only way you are going to sell this to the city council, is by demonstrating that there will be no loss of revenue earning disc parking space, but rather, a freeing up of the streets, and the reallocation of disc parking with the possibility of MORE such space being available. This negates the purpose, but parking can be made available as long as access to the same area is prioritised to buses rather than cars. Keep the buses flowing, and the cars will wind their way into the parking when they really need to.I have drawn up maps of the proposals, with estimated frequencies of buses on each of the corridors, to show how possibly it can be done, though this architecture forum is probably not the place for such a level of detail.
August 30, 2008 at 8:27 pm #746336missarchi
Participant@Busman wrote:
IDublin City Council
Unfortunately, the only way you are going to sell this to the city council, is by demonstrating that there will be no loss of revenue earning disc parking space, but rather, a freeing up of the streets, and the reallocation of disc parking with the possibility of MORE such space being available. This negates the purpose, but parking can be made available as long as access to the same area is prioritised to buses rather than cars. Keep the buses flowing, and the cars will wind their way into the parking when they really need to.I have drawn up maps of the proposals, with estimated frequencies of buses on each of the corridors, to show how possibly it can be done, though this architecture forum is probably not the place for such a level of detail.
draw up a map but look at looping the buses before they hit the plazas or an underground option kinda like this luas/bus tunnel…
http://www.flickr.com/photos/capnsurly/1503505182/sizes/o/
DCC can have at least 2 fold/ten fold/twenty fold many cars spaces as they are prepared to build underground…
need framework plan asap :p
August 31, 2008 at 1:23 am #746337Anonymous
InactiveI am thinking in terms of a more immediate solution to the problem of bus congestion and the exclusion of traffic from College Green, etc. Apart from all the furore about closing off streets, which would die away in time, and the physical hardship of closing streets and repainting lines, and altering the street furniture, Such a scheme could be brought in in under a year if the WILL was there. In the current climate of post boom and cutbacks in public finances, the gains from reorganising the one way streets and the buses would cost far less, and provide some level of interim solution, rather than expensive long term plans which may or may not ever happen, because we might need the money for something else.
Bus tunnels would take years to plan and execute, and in any case, if we could build tunnels for buses, we might as well put faster and more capacious Metro trains in.
August 31, 2008 at 8:35 am #746338missarchi
Participantwell the NRA haven’t listed there 2011-2015 projects yet?
September 1, 2008 at 11:42 am #746339reddy
ParticipantThats great stuff Busman, lot of work gone into that. This is probably as good a place as any to post maps. This issue really seriously affects the urban design and future planning of the city centre.
Plus you never know who might be reading…..!
On GrahamH’s post re the shop on Dame St opposite city hall, the amount of pavement space taken up by sandwich boards and the like is really shocking. Its just visual clutter and adds to the sense of disorientation and mess on the city’s streets. Surely it must be an easy thing to implement the removal of these.
September 1, 2008 at 12:08 pm #746340missarchi
Participant@Busman wrote:
Bus tunnels would take years to plan and execute, and in any case, if we could build tunnels for buses, we might as well put faster and more capacious Metro trains in.
well I was passing past the red cow and that is some upgrade!!!
college green needs a fraction of that commitment and funding considering its massive potential
its only shallow cut and cover!!!just leave the queen of tarts alone…
September 2, 2008 at 7:48 am #746341missarchi
Participant‘Top Gear’ is coming to Dublin. Permission to drive a British army tank across O’Connell Bridge and towards the GPO, however, has not been sought. Nor is it likely to be.
“It’s been a dreadful August, and I think it has to do with the amount of people driving electric cars,” Clarkson informed us yesterday, warming to this particular subject. “If the balance of nature is really as delicate as they claim, then all those people with [new] bicycles are probably causing summers to be cold and wet.”
http://www.independent.ie/entertainment/tv-radio/i-give-you-my-tanks-1467331.html
September 2, 2008 at 3:23 pm #746342ctesiphon
ParticipantTop Gear is the nadir of a moribund medium.
On the up side, though: 30,000 revheads in the RDS? Can you spell ‘legitimate target’, Mr Clarkson?
PS A piece of friendly advice- keep away from Ranelagh.
September 2, 2008 at 6:52 pm #746343missarchi
Participantterminate on ground or terminate underground should we put a lid on line f ?
it could easily have a rain protected concrete lid and metro north underground pedestrian connection tunnelSeptember 3, 2008 at 10:15 am #746344fergalr
ParticipantAh, Vienna…. From those two pics above of Stephansplatz, I can tell you that emerging from the U Bahn up those escalators, when you get your first glimpse of the massive West Front of the Stephansdom and its reflection in the Haas House opposite – there’s simply no better way to be introduced to that wonderful city.
Babbling over!
September 3, 2008 at 10:34 am #746345ctesiphon
ParticipantThat was my wish for the Carlton site and Metro.
What better way to say ‘Welcome to Dublin’ than arriving up the escalator to see the GPO, Spire, O’Connell Street, etc.?
Of course, the same could be said for a Metro stop in the new College Green Plaza- imagine coming up where the underground jacks is into a traffic-minimised square… *sob*
September 17, 2008 at 2:18 pm #746346missarchi
Participantwe should ask the EPA to put a air monitoring station in college green for reasons of health…
Part 8 Air-ClimaticBase-Impact 4 of 4 Bantry Road to St Stephen’s Green.pdf
September 17, 2008 at 2:34 pm #746347notjim
Participant@ctesiphon wrote:
Of course, the same could be said for a Metro stop in the new College Green Plaza- imagine coming up where the underground jacks is into a traffic-minimised square… *sob*
How historic are those toilets, I know the cottage Joe Orton frequented was preserved as a monument to something, did the illustrious ever tryst in the college green underground toilets?
When I was young in Galway it was a standing joke to direct tourists to the public toilets by the weir, yes the ones where the urinals empties straight into the Corrib, by claiming they werea subway entrance, can we not play the opposite trick with the CG toilets and turn them into a disguised metro entrance.
(Here is a reference to my preserved cottage factoid: http://www.gmax.co.za/think/history/10/08-joeorton.html, it mentions “slated for preservation” which might be different from preserved.)
September 26, 2008 at 9:37 pm #746348missarchi
Participantinsert stone taoiseach’s in these false windows…
September 27, 2008 at 10:43 pm #746349Anonymous
Inactiveinsert stone taoiseach’s in these false windows…
What about biffo cowan. His statue wont fit. :rolleyes:
October 3, 2008 at 9:50 pm #746350missarchi
Participantlook what I found 🙂
October 4, 2008 at 1:20 pm #746351Anonymous
InactiveInteresting picture.
Found a spot for Cowan Statue. He can have a large statue under the Right Arch as he is always right and stick Berties Statue on the Left as he’s a socialist and he’s has just left…. :rolleyes:
Any in the middle you can have a mega statue dedicated to Mary Harney. The Statue should have Mary eating Butlers Chocolates and at her feet, patients clinging at her trousers begging for help. 😉
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

