Boland’s Mill
- This topic has 143 replies, 48 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 3 months ago by
jdivision.
- AuthorPosts
- July 11, 2006 at 7:38 pm #737415
jdivision
ParticipantBoland Mill Development Company, a subsidiary of Benton Properties (whose principal is Sean Kelly) is seek planning 3 new office buildings on the site which total approximately 34,268 sq.m. You can tell instantly it was designed by STW. The existing warehouse building is to be converted toa hotel, multi-storey warehouse fronting the Grand Canal Dock and No’s 33 & 34 Barrow Street are being converted to office use, culminating in a gross development of approximately 40,647 sq.m.
The new office buildings, which range in height from 12 to 16 storeys, are set in a public plaza that extends from Barrow Street to the Grand Canal Dock. The nearby Millennium Tower in Charlotte Quay on the same side of Grand Canal Dock is also 16 storeys. Gary Rhodes is to operate the restaurant in the hotel overlooking Grand Canal Dock.
July 12, 2006 at 10:16 am #737416Rory W
ParticipantMore from today’s times commercial property – image in the paper which I’ll scan later
Boland’s Mill to be developed as office, hotel complex
Three 12 to 16-storey office buildings, a boutique hotel and a restaurant to be run by celebrity chef Gary Rhodes are planned for a key site in Dublin’s south docklands. Jack Fagan reports
One of the key sites in Dublin’s south docklands, the former Boland’s Mill at Grand Canal Dock, Dublin 4, is to be redeveloped as a major office and hotel complex at a cost of over €150 million. When completed, it is likely to be one of the most distinctive and important new developments in the fast changing south docklands.
A development company headed by Sean Kelly of Benton Properties is finalising a planning application for three new office buildings ranging in height from 12 to 16 storeys – the tallest matching the height of the Millennium Tower apartment block at Charlotte Quay, on the opposite side of Ringsend Road.
Boland’s Mill, a cut-stone grain store dating from the 1830s, was sold by the food group IAWS to Mr Kelly 18 months ago for €42 million.
He recently completed a large own-door office and retail scheme at the junction of Mary’s Abbey and Capel Street and previously handled the redevelopment of the former Adelaide Hospital, now one of the highest value apartment schemes in the inner city.
Enda Moore of agent Hooke & MacDonald Commercial, who is letting agent for Boland’s Mill Wharf, says he believes it will set a new benchmark for offices in the city in terms of design, quality and location. It is just a few minutes’ walk from Grand Canal Dock Dart station.
The redevelopment is likely to prove even more challenging than the Adelaide because of its primary position in the Grand Canal Harbour area. Eoin O’Morain of architects Scott Tallon Walker says that one of their objectives will be to enhance the three existing protected structures and to achieve maximum accessibility to both the retained buildings and the waterfront.
Top conservation architect David Slattery has been retained to advise on the listed buildings which were used up to recent years as grain stores. The promoters estimate that the cost of restoring and refurbishing the cut-stone buildings – one of them has around 250 wooden windows – is likely to run to about €3,000 per sq m (€279 per sq ft) as against a cost of €2,000 per sq m (€186 per sq m) for new build.
The existing six-storey building on Ringsend Road is to accommodate a four-star, 53-bedroom boutique hotel along with a health spa and brasserie. The building will also have a 150-seater restaurant at ground floor level to cater for visitors, as well as about 2,000 people who are likely to be working on the site. The restaurant, to be known as D4, will be run by celebrity chef Gary Rhodes, who has also opened a restaurant in Mr Kelly’s newly-completed development off Capel Street.
Several Irish, UK and international hotel chains have already expressed interest in operating the hotel, which stands to benefit from the large number of companies moving into the Grand Canal docks area. The hotel opening will coincide with the closure of at least two of the Jurys Doyle hotels in nearby Ballsbridge.
Two other listed buildings on the Boland’s site, a multi-storey warehouse fronting on to Grand Canal Dock, and numbers 33 and 34 Barrow Street, are also to be redeveloped as offices, bringing the gross development to 40,647sq m (437,524sq ft). The tall concrete silo pits that dominate much of the site were built in the 1950s and will be demolished. The two listed buildings being turned into offices will be for sale or to let.
The two main new buildings will stand 12 and 16-storeys high and will face on to an impressive public plaza that will extend from Barrow Street onto Grand Canal Dock. The taller block will have a net floor area of 15,488sq m (166,711sq ft) while the other will have 7,442sq m (80,104sq ft). They are likely to be used as corporate headquarters and will be interlinked by a glazed central core featuring 10 lifts, each capable of carrying 21 people as well as a stairwell.
The two blocks will be capable of being operated as a single headquarters or as two separate entities. Floor sizes generally will range from 887 to 1,206sq m (9,548-12,981sq ft).
The third new office block planned for the site will be 14 storeys high and will bring the new floor areas up to 34,268sq m (368,857sq ft). While the three new buildings will have air conditioning, windows will be capable of being opened to allow natural ventilation. A further 1,608sq m (17,308sq ft) office building on the north-east corner of the site will cater for small to medium-sized occupiers.
July 12, 2006 at 10:38 am #737417Anonymous
InactiveThanks for that info Jdivision and Rory W. So that is that, the silos are to go. I must say that I find the name of the proposed restaurant slightly disturbing.
July 12, 2006 at 11:33 am #737418ConK
ParticipantQuote:[Gary Rhodes is to operate the restaurant in the hotel overlooking Grand Canal Dock./QUOTE]
Isn’t Gary Rodes operating a restaurant on Capel Street? I guess he’ll operate both. he must be moving to Dublin?July 12, 2006 at 1:01 pm #737419tommyt
ParticipantSeen the photomontage in the paper. More of STW depressingly mediocre blandness
July 12, 2006 at 1:18 pm #737420jdivision
Participant@ConK wrote:
[Gary Rhodes is to operate the restaurant in the hotel overlooking Grand Canal Dock./QUOTE]
Isn’t Gary Rodes operating a restaurant on Capel Street? I guess he’ll operate both. he must be moving to Dublin?🙂 Yeah right, one night a month in one of the restaurants i suspect. Rhodes D7 has an okay chance of survival because of the solicitor/barrister element, the one on Grand Canal Dock should do well simply because there’s nothing else really around there. After a couple of years though people will get bored of both.
The menu’s not very original
http://www.rhodesd7.com/menu.pdfJuly 12, 2006 at 1:28 pm #737421a boyle
Participantnext person who uses the word boutique, gets it .
July 12, 2006 at 1:53 pm #737422jdivision
Participant[attach]2488[/attach]
July 12, 2006 at 2:25 pm #737423urbanisto
ParticipantWow! The Hawkins House of the Noughties. That is spectacularly awful. Despite the apparent criticism of everyone from the City Council to NIMBY residents, to the DDDA the fact of the matter is that developers (and Grand Canal Dock is all developer-led) just havent come up with the goods regarding quality buildings in this quarter. I cant think of one decent highrise so far proposed on this site with the exception of Alto Vetro.
As for D4…its a sad day when a restuarant is used to sell a development. At least they were sticking in fullblown Museums in the schemes gone before.
July 12, 2006 at 3:03 pm #737424Rory W
ParticipantWas just about to post a scan of that image – really is fucking awful isn’t it. You’d think that on an important site like this they’d come up with something better.
STW hang your heads in shame – this would look bland in a retail park and a six year old would do better than this crap
July 12, 2006 at 3:18 pm #737425urbanisto
ParticipantSTW really are the bland face of the Celtic Tiger; lazy architecture and yet they are so prolific. They’re responsible for more highrise dross at Point Village. Another landmark beacon blah blah….
I also find it interesting that a company like Gary Rhodes Restuarants could commit to a project that hasnt even been granted permission yet!. Surely it would make a lot more sense for him to locate closer to the Leibskind Theatre.
July 12, 2006 at 3:22 pm #737426d_d_dallas
ParticipantThat is a million miles from the render in their book. Were architects involved or is this the structural engineers design?
July 12, 2006 at 3:23 pm #737427The Denouncer
ParticipantI envisaged a 32 storey tower for that site, bought for €42 million or something. That’s not exactly awe inspiring to put it mildly..in such a great site! What the hell are they restricted or something?
July 12, 2006 at 3:27 pm #737428urbanisto
Participant@The Denouncer wrote:
What the hell are they restricted or something?
In their imaginations perhaps…or mabe AutoCad was acting up the day it was designed.
July 12, 2006 at 7:35 pm #737429ctesiphon
Participant@StephenC wrote:
or mabe AutoCad was acting up the day it was designed.
Or maybe they badly sellotaped together the rubbish from Richard Meier’s shreddit bins?
(A rehashed gag, I know, but perhaps appropriate for a stylistically rehashed building?)
July 13, 2006 at 12:02 am #737430GrahamH
ParticipantIn that rendering they look extraordinarily like 1960s social housing, especially with that distinctive capping band around the top – truly hideous buildings, the squat 12 storey in particular.

It would also appear that the silos are being used an excuse to get away with this heavy massing that is so inappropriate for the location; the buildings look like they’ve been shovelled onto the site for maximum floor gain with no concession to the environment. The silos are an inherent part of this industrial landscape – these yokes are not.
This is not elegant, striking juxtaposing – it’s simply brashness, using bloated structures of a botched design by the most boring practice of blah brokers in the country.
July 13, 2006 at 10:18 am #737431TLM
ParticipantI agree STW are truly APPALLING! What always puzzles me is why they are used so much??
July 13, 2006 at 2:16 pm #737432Pepsi
Participantthat proposal is truly awful.
July 13, 2006 at 2:22 pm #737433NeilA
ParticipantSlightly off topic…. but does anyone have a picture of what Bolands Bakery on Grand Canal Street used to look like i.e. prior to it becoming the Treasury Building?
July 13, 2006 at 2:26 pm #737434a boyle
Participanti think i shall have to object.
Is one allowed to object on the basis of poor architecture ?
I cannot understand this proposal. This spot has potential to please everybody: the planners the public the developer the architect (and us losers !). What i mean is trade quality for height. I would have no problem with a very tall slender structure , like the one pictured earlier on this thread.
Just don’t get it . looks like a duplo building.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

