Alto Vetro, grand canal docks, dublin

Home › Forums › Ireland › Alto Vetro, grand canal docks, dublin

Viewing 20 posts - 241 through 260 (of 359 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #788213
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @johnglas wrote:

    Is this the ‘Get a Life’ thread?

    Afaik tbh :rolleyes:

    Will be interesting all right to see if aqua survives the collapse.

    #788214
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @cgcsb wrote:

    Liberty Hall is 59m tall. So yes I would definitely agree that there is a barrier. What height is the Milenium Tower in The grand canal dock? surely it’s about the same?

    Aqua will be 24 floors with a double height ground floor so possibly 90m

    Millenium tower has 16 floors, but its residential, so with lower floor to ceiling heights its probably more in the 48-50 region.

    #788215
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @johnglas wrote:

    Is this the ‘Get a Life’ thread?

    Oh I forgot…this is Dublin so we can’t discuss high-rise. I am surprised you didn’t trot out the old chesnut about us being lacking in the manhood department because towers are a phalic symbol:)!!!

    C

    #788216
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Superfluous; it’s OK to discuss HR, but the obsession with measured height is, well, phallist at the very least. (Except of course that dicks stick out and not up!)

    #788217
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    …..and why are we talking about cocks?

    I mean there’s off point and then there’s ridiculous:D:D

    #788218
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Yeh but when you are so hard up for any large erections, like we poor Dubs are, one must never prematurely pull out of any mass debates on the issue at hand.

    #788219
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Com on lads, this is all getting a bit hard to swallow….lets get back on top…ic:))

    C

    #788220
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    thebigC: and the C is for…?

    #788221
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @johnglas wrote:

    thebigC: and the C is for…?

    Hahaha…..oh jesus…….

    #788222
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    My, this topic has aroused a sudden burst of new interest on the thread, even if the innuendo is of the rather limp variety (and not always structurally accurate). Someone put a shuddering end to it please.

    #788223
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Done! Who can resist the digit of reason?

    #788224
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I’m already excited about the oother propasal at the boland site cant thy put another 10 floors on it. It seems we are afraid to go over 30 floors why?

    We need to grow up,, and yes that even means the buildings.:)

    #788225
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @johnglas wrote:

    Superfluous; it’s OK to discuss HR, but the obsession with measured height is, well, phallist at the very least. (Except of course that dicks stick out and not up!)

    Ah now, what’s wrong with throwing in structural facts as well as opinions? TBH it is very solemn to be discussing ‘will it or won’t it be over 60 metres tall’ especially after my recent trip to New York, but the fact of the matter is that Liberty Hall has been the tallest building in Dublin for over 40 years. 63 metres breaks the monotony of high-rise (pff) structures that have randomly gone up in Dublin (Santry Cross, Alto Vetro, Canary Dwarf) A new tallest is a new tallest.
    In other cities a building like this would not make the news. Maybe if a building of 60 floors in an otherwise medium rise city would create a stir, but this is Dublin and we have to play the card we are dealt.

    #788226
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    OK, I may be missing something, but I just don’t see what is so magical about ‘breaking’ some imaginary barrier. Never mind how tall it is, is it any good?

    #788227
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @johnglas wrote:

    thebigC: and the C is for…?

    Well….if its the C word I think you are thinking of…….my ex gf would definately agreee in terms of scale!!!:))

    You meant Cunt right:))

    #788228
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @dave123 wrote:

    I’m already excited about the oother propasal at the boland site cant thy put another 10 floors on it. It seems we are afraid to go over 30 floors why?

    We need to grow up,, and yes that even means the buildings.:)

    Exactly…..when they chop floors off buildings it can make them look very sqat!

    #788229
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @Keen wrote:

    Ah now, what’s wrong with throwing in structural facts as well as opinions? TBH it is very solemn to be discussing ‘will it or won’t it be over 60 metres tall’ especially after my recent trip to New York, but the fact of the matter is that Liberty Hall has been the tallest building in Dublin for over 40 years. 63 metres breaks the monotony of high-rise (pff) structures that have randomly gone up in Dublin (Santry Cross, Alto Vetro, Canary Dwarf) A new tallest is a new tallest.
    In other cities a building like this would not make the news. Maybe if a building of 60 floors in an otherwise medium rise city would create a stir, but this is Dublin and we have to play the card we are dealt.

    Too right its a big deal. Particularly, when you consider the ammount of money that was sloshing around for a few years, its frankly remarkable that not even one or two buildings crept through planning that exceeded Liberty Hall in height.

    I think its because there is such a stigma in Dublin around this issue that subsumes everything else once a proposal is in any sense taller then average. For example, I think if The Elysian had been proposed for Dublin…it wouldn’t have got further then ABP!

    #788230
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Surely in the case of the Boland’s Mill bldg that sets the precedent for the height in its immediate vicinity; any new development (assuming the mill is kept and not swept away in some neo-modernist (i.e. old-fashioned) frenzy) should complement it rather than swamp it. There are plenty of riverside locations for signal high-rises; this is not one of them.

    #788231
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Boland’s Mill is an extremely ugly, derelict piece of 1950s industrial equipment that would have been demolished this year if it were not for the inevitable property market collapse. New buildings should certainly be well designed and appropriate to their setting, but should not be required to complement a structure that is both condemned and undeserving.

    #788232
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @dave123 wrote:

    I’m already excited about the oother propasal at the boland site cant thy put another 10 floors on it. It seems we are afraid to go over 30 floors why?

    We need to grow up,, and yes that even means the buildings.:)

    Haha,slow down there mate,we have to get past 16 floors first!

    Lets just take it one baby step at a time 😀

Viewing 20 posts - 241 through 260 (of 359 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.