Abbey Theatre is unlikely to be redeveloped at its present location

Home Forums Ireland Abbey Theatre is unlikely to be redeveloped at its present location

Viewing 20 posts - 41 through 60 (of 96 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #741261
    Rockflanders
    Participant

    They should put it beside the new conference centre, create a landmark location. A purpose built, architecturally magnificent building that would have the possibility of using its space on a commercial basis as an overflow for the conference centre. means i wouldn’t have to pay as much to see an overrated production of whichever ocasey/synge/friel tripe is currently playing in rotation.

    #741262
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Originally posted by Graham Hickey

    What do people make of the present Scott theatre. Was it purposely designed as a fortress given the area of town it’s in?
    The ‘floating’ effect intended I don’t think works – not that the extention to the front helps – but overall think it is one of the most unpleasant buildings in the city, to the extent one wouldn’t even think it was architect designed. I’ve always tried to understand its design and to put it in context of being new and in good condition etc, but still cannot get round how it just looks like a giant public convenience.

    This building has always baffled me. Even years ago before I took any real interest in the built environment I remember it. It is so unussual that part of me likes it for that reason, but when I really think about it and its relationship to the street I cannot find much that pleases me about it. Also, as you say Graham, that tacked on extention really does it no favours at all.

    #741263
    Sue
    Participant

    My OPW sources say they have excluded two of the three shortlisted sites (Colaiste Mhuire and docklands) and are concentrating on Hawkins House. They need to buy some properties in the vicinity in order to extend the footprint, and are sussing that out. Neighbouring landowners are, as we speak, adding noughts to the value of their buildings…..

    #741264
    vinnyfitz
    Participant

    @Sue wrote:

    My OPW sources say they have excluded two of the three shortlisted sites (Colaiste Mhuire and docklands) and are concentrating on Hawkins House. They need to buy some properties in the vicinity in order to extend the footprint, and are sussing that out. Neighbouring landowners are, as we speak, adding noughts to the value of their buildings…..

    That’s strange Sue, I’m not sure I would rely on your sources. For example, it’s not true that docklands was one of the three shortlisted options.
    😉

    #741265
    vinnyfitz
    Participant

    So its either Colaiste Mhuire or Hawkins House according to the Irish Times today.

    I’d prefer Hawkins House but I fear the vacant and decaying school has the edge. Will the Theatre be enough of a magnet to invigorate that entire corner of Parnell Square?
    I mean, where on earth would one go for a pint after the show?

    Anyone know what are the plans for the development of the Rotunda hospital?

    Full article:

    The Minister for Arts, Sport and Tourism, Mr O’Donoghue, is to ask the Cabinet to approve a new Dublin site for the Abbey Theatre within a matter of weeks.

    The Minister is currently studying two sites, Hawkins House – the home of the Department of Health which was once the site of the Theatre Royal – and Coláiste Mhuire, a former school, on Parnell Square.

    A third site at Infirmary Road has been ruled out because it is perceived to be too far from the the city centre. Another possibility, the former Carlton Cinema site in O’Connell Street, has been dropped because of a legal dispute over ownership.

    A spokesman for Mr O’Donoghue insisted last night that no decision on the two final sites had yet been made, but the Minister was particularly keen to resolve the issue before Christmas, allowing the decision on the future of the Abbey to be taken in its centenary year.

    The spokesman said appraisal of the two sites was still being carried out by the Office of Public Works which was looking at the “commercial sensitivities” of the Coláiste Mhuire site. The spokesman explained that commercial sensitivities was a reference to the fact that “not all of the site at Parnell Square is in public ownership”. But he added that whichever site emerged from the process is to be brought to Cabinet by Mr O’Donoghue “within weeks”.

    While the Coláiste Mhuire site has the advantage of retaining the Abbey Theatre within the north inner-city – in the constituency of the Taoiseach, Mr Ahern – the five publicly owned Georgian houses on the site are listed for preservation in the Dublin City Development Plan. To move the Abbey successfully to the site would represent an architectural challenge, but not an insurmountable one.

    Coláiste Mhuire has the advantage of being on Parnell Square where the Gate Theatre, the Ambassador Cinema, the Dublin Writers’ Museum, and the Hugh Lane Municipal Gallery are already housed. The National Wax Museum is around the corner in Granby Row. The establishment of the Abbey Theatre on the square would be a major boost for Dublin City Council’s hopes to expand the cultural range of facilities in the north city.

    Against this, Hawkins House has regularly featured in various lists of Dublin’s worst buildings. The Tánaiste and Minister for Health, Ms Harney, remarked on taking up office there recently that half the windows wouldn’t open while the other half wouldn’t close. Its city centre location and association with the Theatre Royal are seen as positive elements.

    The Government initially decided to redevelop the Abbey on its existing site and turned down the offer of a new site in the docklands. However, the existing site is not large enough and acquiring additional properties would be prohibitively expensive and time-consuming.

    #741266
    Frank Taylor
    Participant

    @vinnyfitz wrote:

    I mean, where on earth would one go for a pint after the show?

    Joxer Dalys or the Waxies Dargle. You can try out your cod Sean O’Casey Dublin accents on the salt of the earth in these fine establishments. I’m sure you will be received with open arms.

    #741267
    cobalt
    Participant

    Yesterday’s Sunday Times said that Colaiste Mhuire had been chosen.

    Sunday Times – November 14, 2004
    Abbey gets Parnell Sq school site
    John Burns and Siobhan Maguire
    A FORMER Christian Brothers college on Parnell Square in Dublin is set to be unveiled as the new home of the Abbey theatre.
    Colaiste Mhuire, one of the city’s best-known Irish language schools, was abandoned last year because of its dilapidated state and has since been handed over to the government as part of the child abuse redress scheme.
    The Office of Public Works is understood to be buying up an adjoining building to make the site big enough for a new national theatre. A major international architectural competition will be organised to decide who designs it.
    John O’Donoghue, the arts minister, is aiming to secure cabinet agreement on a new site for the Abbey before the end of its centenary year, which expires on December 28. Its current premises is inadequate, and it is too expensive to rebuild the theatre on site.
    Colaiste Mhuire has been chosen from a shortlist of three city-centre locations, which included Hawkins House, a hideous office block near Trinity College. All three sites were in public ownership.
    One of the factors that swayed it for Parnell Square is the number of cultural institutions in the area. The National Wax Museum, the Hugh Lane Gallery and the Irish Writers’ Centre are all neighbours, while the Garden of Remembrance is across the road and the Gate and the Ambassador theatres are at the opposite corner of Parnell Square.
    The facade of the five Georgian buildings is listed, and planners expect that the new grand entrance to the theatre will be on Granby Row, beside the wax museum. There is already a 1960s theatre on the site.
    A planning official said: “There is no design as yet, so there is no entrance or configuration for the building. They have a site which they own, and it has the capacity to take the Abbey, so they are simply saying ‘Let’s have this as the preferred site’. That’s not to say they won’t run into planning or practical difficulties — it isn’t going to be easy.
    “Dublin city council has serious ambitions to upgrade Parnell Square and clearly a building of the stature of the national theatre would contribute greatly to that ambition.”
    The interiors of the five Georgian buildings are listed, so knocking down internal walls or removing ceilings will not be allowed, setting a huge challenge for the architects. The new national theatre will need two auditoriums, a rehearsal space, a restaurant/bar, an education facility and an archive.
    “The floor space is there, and an auditorium; it fits,” said the official. “Putting a national theatre there is not impossible, it can be done.”
    The saga of the Abbey theatre’s new home has been tortuous. The current building suffers from serious defects, such as having no link between the Abbey stage and the Peacock, the experimental theatre in the basement. There are also acoustic problems.
    In 2002, the cabinet decided to redevelop the Abbey on its present site, and turned down the offer of a space in Dublin’s docklands. The Abbey’s board had favoured a move down-river, and out of Bertie Ahern’s constituency.
    An expert group later concluded that the existing site was not big enough to solve the theatre’s accommodation problems. Adjacent properties needed to be bought in order to allow the theatre to stay there.
    A study by the OPW concluded that persuading 20 neighbouring property owners to sell to the state would take too long and be too expensive. Rebuilding the Abbey theatre on its current site would have cost €50m, O’Donoghue said recently.
    Earlier this year his officials selected the Carlton cinema site on O’Connell Street as the best new location. Dublin city council was compulsorily purchasing the site, and the department hoped a court challenge from the owners would be speedily resolved. But judgment is still pending, and O’Donoghue’s officials decided to look at other options.
    A further attraction of the Colaiste Mhuire site is that it is in the electoral constituency of Bertie Ahern, the taoiseach, who has made it clear he wants the national theatre to remain in Dublin’s north inner city.
    One of the oldest Irish language schools in the country, Colaiste Mhuire is the alma mater of Brian Farrell, the broadcaster, and Alan Dukes, the former Fine Gael leader. The buildings were taken over by the Christian Brothers in the 1930s.
    The new Abbey theatre will probably be built as a public- private partnership (PPP), although O’Donoghue recently indicated a measure of frustration with such projects. He described PPPs as a demanding, complex and time-consuming procedure.

    #741268
    TLM
    Participant

    I think it would be a great pity to go ahead with the Colaiste Mhuire site..particularly as the “grand enterance” to the theatre would probably be facing on to Granby Row. Parnell Square does have the potential to become a significant cultural axis but locating the Abbey in the Colaiste Mhuire building would do it a dis-service.

    I also agree that the GPO would make a splendid location…it’s grossly under used as a post office! If logistics mean a theatre is’nt possible consideration should be given to locating a museum there.

    While bearing other sites in mind, the cabinet should continue to look at the Carlton site. If the theatre’s uses were expanded developing the theatre there could give O’Connell Street a cultural anchor and increase footfall on the northern half of the street.

    #741269
    J. Seerski
    Participant

    Well heres to the Parnell Square Move! It bodes good for the Square and the vicinity – it needs it!

    #741270
    GrahamH
    Participant

    As much as the Hawkins site is desirable, you can’t help but feel the Parnell site is equally so, as part of the ‘cultural quarter’ up there. It would certainly do wonders for the long-neglected square, but equally so for Hawkins – and certainly from an archetectural viewpoint the latter is far superior. It’s a toss-up really.

    The site on Parnell Square is one of the most unique places in Georgian Dublin and I hope that the area won’t be ‘plazafied’ in any major way. Like no other place in the north Georgian city, you really appreciate up on that corner how the suburbs were just planted on top of a hill, over-looking the old town, and the vast expanse of roadway at this corner distinctly sweeping upwards and round to Palace Row is just wonderful – the place has barely been tamed. I’d hate to see a public plaza of clinical granite swallowing this up.
    Likewise the stone doorcase set into one of two bow windows of the property is equally unique, and there’s even very few bows so publicly on display in Dublin too.
    There’s just a lovely untouched feeling to this area, and sense of calm that would be terrible to lose – so whereas the buildings are protected in this scheme, one hopes the streetscape will be too.

    #741271
    trace
    Participant

    The national theatre skulking in the back gardens of a terrace of pretty average houses? GUBU!

    #741272
    Paul Clerkin
    Keymaster

    I tend to agree – the cpacity for a grand architectural statement doesn’t exist with the Parnell Squaret site, no matter how good the intentions. Those buildings are listed (afaik) and will find a sympathetic use yet. The Hawkins site is a chance to reverse a serious blemish on the city.

    #741273
    kefu
    Participant

    I also agree. I think it will do absolutely nothing to bring new audiences to the theatre. It’s all well and good talking about a cultural quarter but the existence of Hugh Lane, Dublin Writer’s Museum, the Gate and the Wax Museum have already failed to bring any great vitality to this area – why would the new Abbey change the trend of a generation? Some other use could easily be found for those fine buildings.
    I feel that jamming cultural institutions into ill-suited spaces (IMMA, Collins Barracks, the forced changes to the National Gallery), has been a failure in many ways.
    It would make more sense for the Dept of Health to move up to the Mhuire and take this opportunity to get rid of Hawkins House and get a genuine landmark building in its place.
    Personally, I’d love to see the majority of buildings in that Hawkins St area, Apollo House, Hawkins House, the Screen cinema levelled to make way for a National Theatre, a rebuilt Screen cinema, and so on.
    There is so much emphasis put on the rejuvenation of the Docklands and the Smithfield area that it’s forgotten that just a hundred yards from Westmoreland Street, there is an area literally dying on its feet, including at least a half-dozen derelict shops (along Tara Street) as well as the highest percentage of bad architecture (apart from Ballsbridge) in the city.

    #741274
    notjim
    Participant

    kefu, i don’t agree that the IMMA has been a failure in many ways, I have always found it a fine gallery and a good use for the building. i also like the forced change to the NGI, having the ballroom in the middle of the restaurant is such fun.

    #741275
    kefu
    Participant

    Don’t get me wrong – I like IMMA. But every time I visit, I find myself one of a handful of people in the place.
    Visitor numbers there are around 300,000 a year – less than 850 people a day, free of charge, and including people who only go up for a cup of coffee.
    As a for instance, here’s what IMMA’s own curator had to say about it in one interview in the Irish Times: “I knew that we could do with more money, obviously. But I like the building: the architecture is wonderful, though there are limitations. It has its peculiarities. The lack of a large room, for example. And the difficulty of moving things around – it’s not very high-tech from a practical point of view. But then the nature of the space allows us to keep several things going at once, and that is really what I wanted to do.”
    If he’s saying that in public, imagine what he thinks in private. Imagine trying to fit a really large work by Claes Oldenburg or Alexander Calder in IMMA. It’s very limiting.
    Collins Barracks suffers some low footfall as well but I hear things have picked up since the Luas line opened.

    #741276
    J. Seerski
    Participant

    Well thought out, the Abbey could be very successful at Parnell Square. With such gravitas that the Abbey could bring to the square, more restaurants will inevitably open – the Gate does bring crowds, but not in sufficient numbers to make more quality restaurants viable. Given the structure of Cholaiste Mhuire, its protected rooms could be used as exhibition rooms, cafes, book-shops etc, rather than making the theatre a stand alone operation, this would make it more viable than at present. The building has some very fine features – the staircase at its side entrance is particularly fine.
    I hope this will broaden the renaissance of the north city beyond O’Connell Street – more importantly, the ‘city’ is too small at present, and the main attractions should be spread out beyond a few streets. Moving to Parnell Square loosens the congested nature of Dublins main attractions – ie too many in too small an area.

    #741277
    Paul Clerkin
    Keymaster

    Price of site stops relocation of Abbey Theatre
    Deirdre Falvey, Arts Editor

    The Minister for the Arts, Mr O’Donoghue, informed the Cabinet yesterday that he is not in a position to announce a new location for the Abbey Theatre before Christmas, as he had promised.

    Mr O’Donoghue said negotiations on the purchase of a building in Parnell Square, Dublin, which forms part of the site selected for the relocation of the theatre, have broken down.

    The Minister said the vendors were looking for a sum in excess of what the Department considered was a fair market price.

    http://www.ireland.com/newspaper/ireland/2004/1215/4179574805HM9ABBEYMOVE.html

    its like the building of the Michael Scott theatre all over again….

    #741278
    vinnyfitz
    Participant

    Lots more detail in the rest of the article. Hawkins House – as we knew – and Infirmary Rd! which would be an appaling prospect were the other two short listed options.

    O’Donoghue seems to have made no reference at all to O’Connell St.

    He says he does not have the power to CPO no 1 Granby Row so he wants to see if the OPW could develop the site without the corner. Seems like the IT is facilitating negotiation by megaphone between the Minister and the vendors.

    I wonder will the new theatre be fully designed by the OPW or will it be the subject of a competition once a site is eventually acquired?

    #741279
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @vinnyfitz wrote:

    Lots more detail in the rest of the article. Hawkins House – as we knew – and Infirmary Rd! which would be an appaling prospect were the other two short listed options.

    O’Donoghue seems to have made no reference at all to O’Connell St.

    He says he does not have the power to CPO no 1 Granby Row so he wants to see if the OPW could develop the site without the corner. Seems like the IT is facilitating negotiation by megaphone between the Minister and the vendors.

    I wonder will the new theatre be fully designed by the OPW or will it be the subject of a competition once a site is eventually acquired?

    I read the article during the week and I have to say I was shocked by the value claimed by the vendors, my own estimate of value was 1.65m adopting a generous scenario.

    I really think it should be back to the drawing board on this one as far as site selection goes, personally I favour Hawkins House or even an acquisition of College House and the Screen Cinema on Townsend St as it would give a much higher profile. The base line is the Minister was right to walk away from Granby Court but the City needs its National Theatre, I like the idea of Hawkins House going but it would suffer from exactly the same problem as the existing one does, it would have zero profile, where would you get a view from?

    #741280
    TLM
    Participant

    Finally some info on what seems to be happening with the Abbey saga.. I think the article’s conclusion that it would be better to await progress on the carlton site is the right one..if this is to be a signature building left to Dublin for many years after we should be sure we are making the right choices. The OPW concept of a tunnel entrance to the Cloaiste Mhuire site sounds bizzare to say the least..

    The other interesting point the article raises is the future of Parnell Square. I think it has lots of potential but would like to see the current sculpture of the Children of Lir and poem incorporated somehow..

    Interested to hear your thoughts!

    What really matters is getting it right for the Abbey

    The Government should not be rushed into relocating the Abbey Theatre at the north end of Parnell Square, writes Frank McDonald, Environment Editor.
    The public may well owe a debt of gratitude to the two property owners who are holding out for a king’s ransom by the State to acquire their share of a building off Parnell Square. For this is almost certainly not the right location for a national theatre. The only reason it is being considered at all is that Coláiste Mhuire has fallen into the State’s hands. It happens to be one of a number of properties transferred to public ownership under the controversial 2002 agreement with religious orders to deal with compensation claims by survivors of abuse.

    The former Irish-speaking Christian Brothers’ school consists of five Georgian houses, with more recent extensions to the rear, including a 1960s assembly hall (Amharclann Coláiste Mhuire). Though altered internally over the years, all five houses are protected structures, both inside and out.

    So is No. 1 Granby Row, a three-storey, mid-19th-century building currently trading as Parnell Court, a business centre with five units. Last Wednesday, it was reported that negotiations on its acquisition by the State had broken down because some of its owners wanted too high a price.

    The Minister for Arts, Sport and Tourism, Mr O’Donoghue, regretfully conceded that he was therefore not in a position to announce a new location for the Abbey before the end of this, its centenary year – as he had repeatedly promised. Now, with 10 days to go, his self-imposed deadline will be missed.

    But why the rush?

    Sure, the Government pledged several years ago that the National Theatre would be redeveloped. That was before it became apparent that sufficient property could be acquired in and around Abbey Street to create the larger “footprint” which the theatre has really always needed.

    The dream was to extend southwards to Eden Quay, to give the Abbey a new frontage on the River Liffey. But, in the absence of compulsory purchase powers for purely cultural projects, adjoining property owners could name their price and the State might have to pay much more than market value.

    Then the Abbey made the mistake of flirting with the notion of relocating to the Grand Canal Docks, on the south side of the river just a stone’s throw from Dublin 4. The Taoiseach was reportedly furious, not least because the theatre would be evacuating his constituency, and the idea was quickly dropped.

    The Carlton site on O’Connell Street offered a more tantalising prospect.

    In December 2001, despairing that it would ever be developed by its current owners, Dublin City Council issued a compulsory purchase order for the former cinema and adjoining properties, one of which has been derelict for almost 25 years.

    When this order was challenged by the Carlton Group, the case was heard on a priority basis last spring by the President of the High Court, Mr Justice Finnegan.

    After a lengthy hearing, during the course of which one of the plaintiffs (Richard Quirke) withdrew, he reserved judgment on March 5th last.

    Nine months later, Mr Justice Finnegan has yet to deliver his judgment on the continuing challenge by Paul Clinton, an architect and project manager for the Carlton Group, who claims that he is the beneficial owner of some of its properties. The latest news is that the judgment might be delivered next month.

    As a result of this lengthy delay and the possibility of an appeal to the Supreme Court, the city council was unable to give Mr O’Donoghue an assurance that the matter would be resolved any time soon. So the Minister felt he had no option but to exclude the Carlton site from further consideration.

    Attention then switched to the site of Hawkins House on Poolbeg Street, where the Theatre Royal once stood, and to Coláiste Mhuire. Another proposal to relocate the Abbey to a State-owned site at Infirmary Road was ruled out because it was seen – quite rightly – as being too remote from the city-centre.

    Yet the Coláiste Mhuire site is fraught with difficulty, not least the fact that it is fronted entirely by protected structures – including No. 1 Granby Row. The school’s former buildings also perform an important role in flanking the Hugh Lane Gallery in Charlemont House, as does the Georgian terrace to the east.

    How then can the site accommodate a “signature building”, which is what the Minister has said he wants, without demolishing or drastically altering the existing buildings?

    Or would the Abbey be left lurking behind retained Georgian façades? Either way, it would be less than satisfactory.

    It could be argued that relocating the theatre to Parnell Square would fit in with emerging plans to develop it as a “cultural cluster”. The €12 million Hugh Lane extension, due to open in early 2006, is the first phase of a much bolder plan which might even see the Central Library relocating to the Ambassador. Given that Parnell Square is partially built-up, the idea is to reconfigure it as “a square within a square” – along the lines of Front Square in Trinity.

    The very dead Garden of Remembrance would be one of the casualties, which should prompt a debate about how the centenary of 1916 might best be marked.

    One of the more bizarre elements of the Office of Public Works’ scheme for a new Abbey on the Coláiste Mhuire site is that it would be approached by a “pedestrian underpass” (a tunnel, in plain language) from within the reconfigured square.

    That, in itself, also casts doubt on whether the site is really suitable.

    Instead of rushing into the wrong outcome, Mr O’Donoghue should wait to see how the Carlton row is resolved. Or the Abbey might pursue a more modest plan to extend its backstage area to the site of two adjoining unlisted buildings and acquire and redevelop the nearby health studio as a new Peacock.

Viewing 20 posts - 41 through 60 (of 96 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.