Re: Re: Site Notices

Bren88, I think your statement is unfair. if you read my submission you’d see that I actually commended the applicants on their proposed development. I am in favour of appoximately 80% of it. Only one element of it I felt did not harmonise with the architectural character of the area. That’s what I dealt with.

As I stated, the site notice description was misleading and as a factor others may have been prevented from lodging a submission on the grounds that what they assumed was being proposed wouldn’t impact on their dwelings.

I also felt that even though the application was validated that there should have been mention of the fact of what I brought to the attention of the planning authority regarding site/newspaper notices.