Re: Re: retention – help!
I can see your point of view Barry. However, in this particular case there was a series of adjourments then when it finally was before a Judge and the defendants legal counsel said that they were awaiting the decision of Bord Pleanala the Judge remarked that ‘that was irrelevant’ and that ‘the unauthorised structure should have been removed within two weeks.’
Having said that she did grant the defendants another adjournement. I’m just curious if all what she said is true then how can a decision to retain a development, supercede enforcement proceedings?