Re: Re: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches
Home › Forums › Ireland › reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches › Re: Re: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches
Exploring the source influences of the liturgical Drang to abolish “barriers”, “structures” and other “divisive forces” in liturgical space and practice:
No. 1: Berlin-Charlottenburg – Kommune I
Kommune 1 or K1 was the first politically-motivated commune in Germany. It was created on January 12, 1967, in West Berlin and finally dissolved in November 1969.
Kommune 1 developed from the extraparliamentary opposition of the German student movement of the 1960s. It was intended as a counter-model against the small middle-class family, as a reaction against a society that the commune thought was very conservative.
They were first located (from February 19, 1967, until the beginning of March, 1967) in the empty apartment of the author, Hans Magnus Enzensberger, in FregestraÃŸe 19, as well as in the studio apartment of the author, Uwe Johnson, who was staying in the USA, at NiedstraÃŸe 14 in the Berlin district of Friedenau. After Enzensberger’s return from a long study trip to Moscow, they left his apartment and occupied the home of Johnson at StierstraÃŸe 3 for a short time and then finally moved to the second floor of the back of a tenement house in StephanstraÃŸe 60 in the Stephankiez area of the Berlin district of Moabit.
2 The First Phase: Bizarre acts of provocation
2.1 The “Pudding Assassination”
2.2 The visit of the Shah and the K1 photograph
2.3 The “Arsonist’s Lawsuit”
3 The Second Phase: Sex, drugs and Uschi Obermaier
4 The end of Kommune 1 and its legacy
5 See also
8 External links
Members of the “Munich Subversive Action” (such as Dieter Kunzelmann) and of the Berlin Sozialistischer Deutscher Studentenbund (“SDS”) (such as Rudi Dutschke and Bernd Rabehl) discussed how to break from what they considered to be narrow-minded and bourgeois concepts.
Dieter Kunzelmann had the idea of creating a commune. They decided to try a life of “those passionately interested in themselves”. Kunzelmann soon moved to Berlin. In Berlin, the SDS had its first “commune working group”, which advanced the following ideas:
Fascism develops from the nuclear family. It is the smallest cell of the state from whose oppressive character all institutions are derived.
Men and women live in dependence on each other so that neither could develop freely as people.
This cell (that is, the small family) had to be shattered.
When it was proposed that this theory should be realized as the practice of a life as a commune, many SDS members left, including Rudi Dutschke and Bernd Rabehl, who did not want to give up their marriages and lifestyles. In the end, nine men and women, as well as a child, moved into the empty apartment of Hans Magnus Enzensberger and the studio apartment of the author Uwe Johnson in Berlin-Friedenau, who was staying in New York City at the time, on February 19, 1967. After Enzensberger’s return from an extended study trip to Moscow, the communards left and occupied the main residence of Johnson in the nearby StierstraÃŸe 3. They called themselves Kommune 1.
The early communards included Dagrun Enzensberger (divorced wife of Hans Magnus Enzensberger), Tanaquil Enzensberger (nine years old at that time, daughter of Hans Magnus Enzensberger), Ulrich Enzensberger (Hans Magnus Enzensberger’s brother), Dieter Kunzelmann, Detlef Michel (until March 25, 1967), Volker Gebbert, Hans-Joachim Hameister, Dorothea Ridder, (“the iron Dorothee”), Dagmar Seehuber and Fritz Teufel. Rainer Langhans joined in March 1967. At times, other people also lived in the premises of Kommune 1, such as Dagmar von Doetinchem and Gertrud Hemmer (â€žAgatheâ€œ).
The communards first tried to tell each other their own biographical identity, to break the old certainties. They were very different from each other. Correspondingly, the roles each of them played were soon different. Kunzelmann was the “patriarch” and made sure everyone knew it. His definition of the goals of the commune were based on his time as a “situationist” and in the “Subversive Action”. He was therefore in favor of getting rid of all securities, even financial ones, which is why he scorned study grants, for example. He wanted to abolish any property, any private sphere. And he was against the principle of work, but for the principle of fun or pleasure. Everyone could and should do what he wanted, as long as it happened where everyone could see it.
Langhans, Teufel and the others wore long hair, beaded necklaces, army jackets or Mao suits at the urging of the women of the commune. Soon, they were paid for interviews and photographs. A sign hung plainly in the hallway of their apartment: “First pay up, then speak”.
 The First Phase: Bizarre acts of provocation
During its entire existence, Kommune 1 was infamous for its bizarre staged events that fluctuated between satire and provocation. These events served as inspiration for the “Sponti” movement and other leftist groups.
 The “Pudding Assassination”
As the domestic commune life was too boring, the communards decided to turn their internal experience into actions.
The first of these was the “pudding assassination” of US Vice-President Hubert Humphrey who was scheduled to visit Berlin. On the evening of April 2, 1967, the communards met in Johnson’s apartment with about 20 other people whom they knew from demonstrations. Kunzelmann presented his plan of throwing smoke bombs in the direction of the Vice President on the occasion of the state visit. None of the others besides Langhans wanted to participate.
Police files indicate that the planned attack was revealed by a secret service agent, since eleven students were arrested by officials of Division I (Political Police) on April 5, 1967. They were supposed to have met under conspiratorial conditions and planned attacks against the life or health of Hubert Humphrey by means of bombs, plastic bags filled with unknown chemicals, or with other dangerous tools, such as stones.
Those arrested were Ulrich Enzensberger, Volker Gebbert, Klaus Gilgenmann, Hans-Joachim Hameister, Wulf Krause, Dieter Kunzelmann, Rainer Langhans and Fritz Teufel. The tabloid Bild’s headline was “Humphrey to be assassinated”, the weekly Zeit spoke of “Eleven little Oswalds”. Even the New York Times featured a report on the dangerous plan of eight communards to attack the Vice-President with pudding, yoghurt, and flour. Because of this bad publicity, Uwe Johnson hastily asked his friend and neighbor GÃ¼nter Grass to evict the students from his apartment. The next day, the communards were released and gave their first press conference â€“ they had become celebrities, while the press and police officials had lost face in the public eye. The publisher Axel Springer henceforth called the members of Kommune 1 “communards of horror”.
The commune moved to an apartment in an old building on Kaiser-Friedrich-StraÃŸe on Stuttgarter Platz in the district of Berlin-Charlottenburg and later to StephanstraÃŸe 60 in Berlin-Moabit. Hardly a week passed without the communards staging some kind of satiric provocation somewhere in Berlin, which made headlines in the press. In one of them, the commune climbed up the Kaiser-Wilhelm-GedÃ¤chtniskirche to throw down hundreds of Little Red books from above.
 The visit of the Shah and the K1 photograph
During a demonstration in front of the Opera against the visit of the Shah of Iran on June 2, 1967 (the death of Benno Ohnesorg), Fritz Teufel was arrested and accused of treason. It was not until December that he was released, after he and many students with him had begun a hunger strike. In the streets, sympathizers held wild demonstrations, chanting “Freedom for Fritz Teufel” and “Drive the devil out of Moabit!” (Moabit being Berlin’s prison and Teufel being German for devil).
During Teufel’s absence from Kommune 1, an infamous phototograph of the communards’ naked behinds against a wall was displayed with the headline: Das Private ist politisch! (“The personal is political”)
 The “Arsonist’s Lawsuit”
On June 6, 1967, the “Arsonist’s Lawsuit” was filed against Langhans and Teufel because of flyers calling for arson against department stores, which read, “Holt euch das knisternde Vietnam-GefÃ¼hl, das wir auch hier nicht missen wollen!” (“Catch that burning Vietnam feeling that we would not want to miss at home!”) The court ultimately ruled in favor of Langhans and Teufel, however. They later told the story of the lawsuit in their book, Klau Mich (“Steal Me”), which rose to cult status.
The hedonistic attitude of the communards, who did only what they felt like doing, not only polarized the bourgeoisie but also polarized the political Left.
The SDS especially disliked the provocative activities of the K1. The provocative flyers of the K1 (“Water cannons are paper tigers”) that were signed with the acronym SDS, were a source of continual irritation. Among other things, the communards were accused of having no political interest, but merely indulging in egotism. Hence in May 1967, the SDS expelled the “revolutionary rowdies” (Bild Zeitung).
In the weekly newspaper Zeit, Klaus Hartung wrote: “Scarcely any political theory was more successful than that according to which revolutionaries have to revolutionize, according to which there will be no change in the society without a change in everyday life.”
Kommune 1 developed into a kind of refuge for alternative thinkers for problems of all kinds; appeals for help arrived daily. The house was under a veritable siege by friends and groupies who worshipped Teufel and Langhans. Because of the crowd of women, especially caused by Teufel, he was expelled from the commune. He moved into a Munich commune and later belonged to the Movement 2 June.
 The Second Phase: Sex, drugs and Uschi Obermaier
By the end of the 1960s, the societal climate had changed. In the late summer of 1968, the commune moved into a deserted factory on StephanstraÃŸe in order to reorient. This second phase of Kommune 1 was characterized by sex, music, and drugs.
On September 21, 1968, the commune went to the International Song Days in Essen, the Federal Republic’s first underground festival. There, Langhans met and fell in love with Uschi Obermaier, a model from Munich. She lived with the Munich-based music commune Amon DÃ¼Ã¼l, but soon she moved in with the communards of Kommune 1, who shared one bedroom. Soon, the press called Langhans and Obermaier the “best-looking couple of the APO”.
The politization of the private sphere and the fact that Langhans and Obermaier spoke openly to the media about their relationship, about jealousy and about “pleasure machines” constituted the next breaking of social taboos, ushering in the sexual revolution.[dubious â€“ discuss] Later, John Lennon and Yoko Ono and others followed their example.
All of a sudden, the commune was receiving visitors from all over the world, among them Jimi Hendrix, who turned up one morning in the bedroom of Kommune 1. Obermaier fell in love with him.
Her modeling fees rose sharply, she was given a lead role in Rudolf Thome’s cult movie Rote Sonne (1969). (Rote Sonne at IMDB). (Red Sun), and her photographs were all over posters and magazine covers. Rumor has it[weasel words] that the magazine Stern paid her 20,000 Deutschmark (the price of a Porsche 911 at the time) for an interview and nude photos of Obermaier.
 The end of Kommune 1 and its legacy
Eventually, the energy of Kommune 1 was spent. Kunzelmann’s addiction to heroin worsened and the second communard was expelled from the commune. (It is said[who?] that the other members of the commune left of their own will). Now and then, the Munich women’s communes appeared.
In November 1969, a gang of Rockers raided those who remained and devastated the rooms. The remaining occupants lost their belief in the future of Kommune 1 and they dispersed. Obermaier and Langhans went to Munich.
A table from one of the rooms of the Kommune 1 was bought by the Green Party politician Hans-Christian StrÃ¶bele. During meetings around that same table, the newspaper die tageszeitung and the German Chaos Computer Club were founded. The table was stolen in 1990, and there is some speculation[by whom?] as to its whereabouts today.
 See also
Chaos Computer Club
^ Ulrich Enzensberger, Die Jahre der Kommune I, pp. 105, 108
^ Ulrich Enzensberger, Die Jahre der Kommune I, p. 105
^ The danger of it being turned into a bloodbath by the US security forces was too great.
^ Ulrich Enzensberger, Die Jahre der Kommune I, p. 121
^ Wagner, Christoph (2003). “Deutschlands Woodstock” (in German). http://www.folker.de/200306/02songtage.htm. Retrieved 2007-12-29.
Enzensberger, Ulrich. 2004. Die Jahre der Kommune I. Berlin 1967-1969. KÃ¶ln: Kiepenheuer & Witsch. ISBN 3-462-03413-8
Fahlenbrach, Kathrin. 2004. The Aesthetics of Protest in the Media of 1968 in Germany (conference paper). Proceedings, IX International Congress of the International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature, 2004. Available from: http://www.arts.ualberta.ca/igel/igel2004/Proceedings/Fahlenbrach.pdf (PDF)
Rabehl, Bernd. 2003. Die Provokationselite: Aufbruch und Scheitern der subversiven Rebellion in den sechziger Jahren. (Teil 2: Die Revolte in der Revolte: Die Kommune 1.) Available from: http://people.freenet.de/visionen/Provo2.htm
Martin Klimke, Joachim Scharloth (eds.).2007. 1968. Ein Handbuch zur Kultur- und Mediengeschichte der Studentenbewegung. Stuttgart: Metzler. ISBN 3-476-02066-5
Wolfgang DreÃŸen, Dieter Kunzelmann, Eckhard Siepmann (publ.): Das Nilpferd des hÃ¶llischen Urwalds. Situationisten – Gruppe Spur – Kommune I. Anabas-Verlag, GieÃŸen 1991.
Rainer Langhans, Fritz Teufel: Klau mich. StPO der Kommune I. Edition Voltaire, Frankfurt am Main and Berlin 1968 (Series: Voltaire Handbuch 2), Reprint (without pornographic insert): Trikont Verlag, Munich 1977; Rixdorfer Verlagsanstalt, Berlin undated 
Christa Ritter, Rainer Langhans: Herz der Revolte. Die Kommune 1 von 1967 bis 1969. Hannibal Verlag, 2005, ISBN 3-85445-258-6.
Peter Szondi: Aufforderung zur Brandstiftung. Ein Gutachten im ProzeÃŸ Langhans / Teufel. in: Der Monat, Berlin, 19th year, issue 7, 1967, p. 24-29, also printed in: Peter Szondi: Ãœber eine “Freie (d. h. freie) UniversitÃ¤t”. Stellungnahmen eines Philologen. Suhrkamp Verlag, Frankfurt am Main 1973 (Series: es 620)
 External links
Kommune 1 in Berlin (in German)
This article incorporates information from this version of the equivalent article on the German Wikipedia.
Retrieved from “http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kommune_1”