Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Look at de state of Cork, like!
Originally posted by Diaspora
The only rant on this thread has been that directed against An Taisce, when particular individuals are asked to explain their views they simply reduce the argument to a level that deserves a heated response.
The illegal demolition of Fr Mathew’s Hall was posted on this thread 2 full days before I started its own thread to attempt to stimulate some discussion on the topic.
It is quite clear that some individuals on this thread have no interest in the quality architecture, any development constitutes good development. Once its new that is, anything or anyone who holds a differing opinion is either mad or rants.
But my fundamental greivance hasn’t been addressed, the biggest loss to Cork’s historical building fabric in years Fr Mathew Hall.
One good yardstick in life is always keep the question in focus, this hasn’t happened on this thread.
Diaspora, Diaspora, Diaspora. The reason I put (!) after your name was to inject a little light humour into the whole thing. Obviously missed. It was a reply to Jack White regarding his comments
I think this thread does evoke comment on whether schemes are quality/crap or are good/bad development. There are so many schemes posted that one scheme cannot be covered in its entirety which is why it is good that Matthews hall has its own thread.
Can we get back to review & comment and leave the slagging for the playground?