Re: Re: One Berkley court -132m Tower
I suspected from the word go that this would be the outcome. It’s interesting to see that some of the advocates of the scheme are now talking about the poor quality of the granted elements- an aspect of the debate not much in evidence during the flag-waving about the ‘landmark’ tower.
It’s interesting alright but more because both the advocates and the detractors are responding in the exact same way. Both now seem to of the opinion that the bits granted were the worst bits and that the tower actually had architectural merit. Odd but strangely typical.