Re: Re: One Berkley court -132m Tower
It’s hard to see the logic in a planning decision like this. If height was the issue then surely the 18 story elements would have been shot down too. Feels like they wanted to accept it but were afraid there would be political ructions and so rejected bits and pieces. Compromise is generally a good idea but a prescriptive planning system should be driven by principle only. Presumably Dunne sees what was accepted as a baseline and is hoping to at least “split the difference” going to APB. I am largely in favour this development but this process stikes me as flawed.