Re: Re: no let/sublet clause in conditions of planning
1. The “Rent a room” scheme would not be covered as one is there on licence rather than by letting.
2. “No part of the dwellinghouse” – I would query whether the whole house comes under “part of”. If this were a piece of Legislation, then you’d probably be allowed to let the whole house as legislation is interpreted strictly.
Also under the mischief rule of statutory interpretation, (since the condition would appear to have been put in to prevent turning the garage into a separate flat) interpreting it to mean that “the whole house” is not “part of the dwellinghouse” would make sense.
I’m not certain what rules of interpretation are applied to Planning conditions.
Talk to a solicitor.