Re: Re: gaiety centre

Exactly – the views that Wejcherts never posted! It’s all in the file at the planning deask, ref. 2882/03.
Kefu was won over by the nice glowy low-level image posted by the Wejcherts’ architect (that’s why architects produce nice glowy images of their schemes!) and Rory W couldn’t believe why An Taisce were appealing (any clearer now Rory W?).

Just to recap, the developlment in the first image was granted permisson by DCC (!) & overturned on appeal (thrree parties appealed; John Phelan, Hugh & Ester McGahon and An Taisce).