Re: Re: gaiety centre
Exactly – the views that Wejcherts never posted! It’s all in the file at the planning deask, ref. 2882/03.
Kefu was won over by the nice glowy low-level image posted by the Wejchertsâ€™ architect (thatâ€™s why architects produce nice glowy images of their schemes!) and Rory W couldnâ€™t believe why An Taisce were appealing (any clearer now Rory W?).
Just to recap, the developlment in the first image was granted permisson by DCC (!) & overturned on appeal (thrree parties appealed; John Phelan, Hugh & Ester McGahon and An Taisce).