Re: Re: Buildings on stilts in the Liffey

@ctesiphon wrote:

That letter is not factually incorrect- it described the existing conditions under the current DDDA planning scheme for that area.

Maybe I was a bit vague, sorry ctesiphon.
The point I was making is that it is twofaced to object to 6 “Stories” (one higher) when the DDDA are aiming to have 20 “Stories” … That’s the “storie”… lol
B4 n e of u say n e tin … I shuda spelt “their is” as “there is” in my post 229.

Sigh!!! gunter says “no burning torches” just a lightswitch.