upper camden street
- This topic has 28 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 8 months ago by
Anonymous.
- AuthorPosts
- September 1, 2009 at 4:53 pm #710740
docjohnoscar
ParticipantApologies if this question has been asked before. When recently on holiday in Dublin, we stayed at the Camden Court Hotel on Upper Camden Street. Opposite our hotel on Camden Street is a typical Georgian terrace that is derelict, waiting to be redeveloped, presumably. One of these houses (I deduce, #4, since #6 is two houses away–named Allied Business Supplies) has a full-house width door arch instead of a standard doorway with a window beside it, like most of the others. Next door, which I call #5, has that window but an additional circular window instead of a door to the street. The whole aspect is unusual. What were these buildings before they became derelict? Are the archway and the circular window next door original?
- September 1, 2009 at 4:56 pm #809685
Paul Clerkin
Keymaster - September 1, 2009 at 5:58 pm #809686
Anonymous
InactiveThat’s it, redevelopment application was turned down from guys who used to own Flannerys and continue to own what was the Corner Stone and Nancy Hands pubs.
- September 2, 2009 at 9:34 am #809687
Anonymous
InactiveThis building is and has been in a terrible state for years. There’s also the old hotel beside it which is been advertised as storage space.
Disgraceful that the city council allows buildings like this waste away.
- September 2, 2009 at 3:36 pm #809688
Anonymous
InactiveIt’s true, these really are wonderful buildings that appear to have been left to rot so they can be bulldozed and replaced with shiny new characterless hulks, a la their neighbours a few doors up. They’ve been like this for a long long time now, and with the way things are they’ll probably stay that way for just as long.
Makes one despair really.
- September 2, 2009 at 4:44 pm #809689
Paul Clerkin
Keymasteri moved to Dublin 20 years ago and they’ve been like that for the duration.
- September 2, 2009 at 8:01 pm #809690
Anonymous
InactiveSo what WAS Camden Hall? A music hall or a theatre-type venue? Or was it a type of village-hall-in-a-city? From the brickwork of the first storey, it’s two “houses” side by side so I assume it’s the ground floor where it’s all one unit. Or was it converted at some time past from two houses into a “hall”?
- September 2, 2009 at 8:23 pm #809691
Anonymous
InactiveIt was the premises of the famous Earley & Company stained glass artists, docjohnoscar. They moved in around 1900, when the delightful commercialising niche was inserted at ground floor level – hence also the circular window with stained glass. There’s also a church out the back, which if I recall, along with the houses, was to be mauled/compromised as part of an insane development proposal as jdivision mentions above. Indeed it may well have been the intention to demolish the church – I can’t remember. The owners are, shall we say, well known for their refined patronage of matters architectural.
The Camden Court Hotel is a great spot for basing youself on a visit to Dublin it has to be said. In addition to their fantastic breakfasts, you walk straight out the door into the most dynamic quarter of the city, with all the vibrancy of Camden Street, the amenities of the Iveagh Gardens and St. Stephen’s Green, the ease of access to the south Georgian core, and the lovely summer morning walks around the gracious residential streets of Portobello. Definitely a spot worth recommending to visiting relatives, if they can endure the tribute to 90s faux mahogany that are the bedrooms.
- September 4, 2009 at 11:14 am #809692
Anonymous
InactiveDidn’t the council serve a CPO/derlict site notice on this place a year or 2 ago?
- September 5, 2009 at 5:31 pm #809693
Anonymous
InactiveI looked up Earley & Co on the Internet and learnt that they were in Camden St until 1975, officially at No.1, Upper Camden St. Presumably that was their office and the archway bit (No.5) was their showroom? Has that site been derelict ever since then? Or was it then that the archway bit became used as “Camden Hall”? Or was it known as a Hall from the beginning when it was Earley’s?
- April 8, 2012 at 11:24 pm #809694
Anonymous
InactiveCan’t find a dedicated thread for Camden St, but thought this would do
Another historic building set on fire
- April 10, 2012 at 10:59 am #809695
Anonymous
InactiveRegarding the former Earley & Co building on Camden street. I was in there at Christmas. Despite there being a fair amout of damage down through the years it is in reasonable shape. There’s a new roof on the entire building and it’s pretty well locked up so further damage from vandals and the elements is reduced considerably.
- April 10, 2012 at 11:05 am #809696
Anonymous
InactiveA view of the window from inside
- April 10, 2012 at 11:41 am #809697
Anonymous
Inactive - May 9, 2012 at 7:30 pm #809698
Anonymous
Inactive@Punchbowl wrote:
Can’t find a dedicated thread for Camden St, but thought this would do
Another historic building set on fire
Just in relation to this building. Wasn’t aware of the history of it, but An Taisce want it declared as a national monument and reinstated (it has been totally demolished). There’s more info on http://www.antaisce.org/
- May 9, 2012 at 9:40 pm #809699
Anonymous
InactiveWow, what a great video and idea. I never knew what that window looked liked. This building has been breaking my heart for so many years.
- May 15, 2012 at 1:48 pm #809700
Anonymous
Inactive - February 11, 2013 at 12:32 pm #809701
Anonymous
Inactive77 Camden Street Lower
It is very sad to see a further shop front changed illegally.
Again, cheap timber cladding has been used (the fourth outlet to do this on Camden Street).
In addition, at No 77, they have added new signage that has necessitated cutting into the first floor window sills. Planning permission for the change of use, specifically stated that any new signage should be the subject of a separate planning permission, as this is an Architectural Conservation Area. Not that you’d know it from the development that takes place. Hopefully Dublin City Council will act soon to reign in these unauthorised developments.
- February 11, 2013 at 12:33 pm #809702
Anonymous
Inactive - February 11, 2013 at 1:50 pm #809703
Anonymous
InactiveI wouldn’t hold your breath…
The street is not an ACA but it is a Conservation Area…not that any of that terminology means very much these days,
- February 11, 2013 at 1:51 pm #809704
Anonymous
InactiveI must have a wander down this part of town… its been a while. Who knows what surprises it holds!
- February 11, 2013 at 3:11 pm #809705
Paul Clerkin
KeymasterNot 100% certain but was the shopfront not similar in design to this and just blue, or am i thinking of a different shopfront on the street.
- February 11, 2013 at 3:13 pm #809706
Paul Clerkin
Keymaster - February 11, 2013 at 3:22 pm #809707
Anonymous
InactiveThanks, Paul. I saw them putting up the “pediment” of the timber facade, & assumed that they had cut into the sills, when it must have been carried out previously.
However, I still don’t agree with what they have added. The facade does not relate to the historic structure behind.
- February 11, 2013 at 5:01 pm #809708
Anonymous
InactiveThe shop has permission to change use to a restaurant under 2271/11
One of the conditions states:
4. Prior to the commencement of development the applicant shall submit to the Planning Authority full details of the signage proposed. Reason: To protect the visual amenity of the area.
That doesn’t mean that they have to apply for planning permission for a new shopfront. They may well agree a new design and works with the Council under this permission.
- February 11, 2013 at 8:01 pm #809709
Paul Clerkin
KeymasterThe basic shopfront with the curve has been like that probably close to 20 years
- February 12, 2013 at 9:23 am #809710
Anonymous
InactiveStephen, my understanding is that the permission was granted after appeal, subject to revised ABP conditions which included the following :
3(a) Details of all external shopfronts and signage shall be the subject of a separate planning permission. - March 1, 2013 at 9:00 am #809711
Anonymous
InactiveI took a walk along Camden Street yesterday for the first time in ages and I have to say my epilepsy returned with a vengence. What an assault on the senses! Utter shopfront chaos. Some premises have made great efforts to design a frontage…others are monstrosities of plastic, garish colours and add-ons. Its wild west planning down there again.
Also really noticed how many restaurants and cafes have opened on the street. Its quite amazing how they all survive.
Camden Street Upper terrace owned by those 3 former guards is a disgrace of course…lots of tacky huckster businesses in painting the place bright pink and yellow…none of them seem to know what soap and water is….or how to sweep up. Scumbags.
Couldnt wait to get off it.
- January 31, 2014 at 12:37 pm #809712
Anonymous
InactiveIt seems Camden Street is to get a new hotel, to be located in the much abused terraced discussed previously. The last plans I say were for a zillion-seat “restaurant” that could only have been the foil for a superpub. The hotel will be a more sympathetic use one hopes.
http://www.independent.ie/business/irish/dublin-gets-new-camden-street-hotel-29966188.html
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.