Letterkenny Town Centre
- This topic has 18 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 19 years, 8 months ago by
dannyboy.
- AuthorPosts
- February 15, 2005 at 3:52 pm #707659
lexington
Participant
Opinions???
February 15, 2005 at 6:51 pm #750974roskav
ParticipantStandard 19th C Town … with a lot of large warehouse shops around the perimeter… similar to galway in that respect..
February 17, 2005 at 4:06 am #750975section4
Participantit is not the town centre, that is the square at the main street. It is another example of profit driven development in letterkenny and in fact is detrimental to the town centre as it will draw people away from the main street. The business owners on the main street have been complaining for months about the fact the main street is dying because of other development on the perimiter of the town Tesco Argos etc taking people away from the main street. Letterkenny is a shambles and a a perfect example of bad town planning, anyone coming to letterkenny by car should be able to park their car and be able toaccess most of the shops but in fact you can not access the shops and services you need in letterkenny without a car. This building reminds me more of a corner in the city centre of a large modern city rather tha a provincial town.
February 17, 2005 at 8:10 pm #750976fergus
Participantsorry but has this ment to heve any architectural merit? this looks ridicilous. I can’t see where this is ment to be -port road possibly or up oliver plunket st.? the building looks over scaled and banal to say the least. and -very much bad commercial architecture of about 10/15 years ago and the render is verry dated looking as well to say the least -not that I have anything against watercolour ,stephen holl does great ones ,But the only thing that tells me this has been done reciently is the mini convertable in the foreground!! I think whoever came up with this should reexamine this project for sure and maybe go look at some good contempory architecture in the mean time. Imagine presenting this at a crit in college !!!! I’m sorry if this all seems harsh but I think It had to be said . I feel embarased for you.
February 18, 2005 at 5:18 pm #750977J Walker
Participant@section4 wrote:
it is not the town centre, that is the square at the main street. It is another example of profit driven development in letterkenny and in fact is detrimental to the town centre as it will draw people away from the main street. The business owners on the main street have been complaining for months about the fact the main street is dying because of other development on the perimiter of the town Tesco Argos etc taking people away from the main street. Letterkenny is a shambles and a a perfect example of bad town planning, anyone coming to letterkenny by car should be able to park their car and be able toaccess most of the shops but in fact you can not access the shops and services you need in letterkenny without a car. This building reminds me more of a corner in the city centre of a large modern city rather tha a provincial town.
On one level I’m all in favour of this development. The traditional town centre is changing and this development is a reflection of that fact. Retailers want bigger units than those available in the traditional TC and so more development of this nature along the Pearse Road is to be encouraged. If it doesn’t happen then people will simply park at the edge of town retail park already in existence and the new one (19unit/15acre) that has just been granted planning permission on the Blaney road and ignore the town completely.
Of course the architecture might be uninspiring but take one look at the monstrosities all over the town and you’ll see aesthetic merit has never been that important to planners in LK anyway……..
February 18, 2005 at 7:33 pm #750978Anonymous
Inactive@lexington wrote:

Opinions???
In the covered bridge coming from the right hand side of the drawing into the proposed building there seems to be a car. Is this the way into a car park from some other building? If so, does this mean thee is another section of the proposal out of view? If not, what is going on?
Thanks
Phil
February 18, 2005 at 10:22 pm #750979GrahamH
ParticipantAh out comes the copper like clockwork – it’s become the new polished granite 🙂
The corner glazing is interesting, but that flat pararpet is as boring as I don’t know what, and is reminiscent of the worst 1990s apartment schemes in Dublin.February 18, 2005 at 10:34 pm #750980Paul Clerkin
KeymasterIt reminds me of a bigger version of a “thing” that was built in Stoneybatter recently – just larger, brasher and tackier.
High Tack Architecture
February 21, 2005 at 10:59 am #750981J Walker
Participant@phil wrote:
In the covered bridge coming from the right hand side of the drawing into the proposed building there seems to be a car. Is this the way into a car park from some other building? If so, does this mean thee is another section of the proposal out of view? If not, what is going on?
Thanks
Phil
Yep, there is a NINE storey section to the right hand side.
The bottom 5 levels are composed of car parking that links up across the road to another car park behind the building you can see in the picture. Then on top of the 5 levels are 4 storeys comprised of shops, office and town houses at the very top – unfortunately there is no picture of this section.
Further details at http://www.letterkennytc.comTo cap it all there is a garage to the right opposite the building in the picture which now looks completely out f place.
February 21, 2005 at 11:14 am #750982Anonymous
InactiveThanks for that J Walker. The artists impression makes more sense in the context of that homepage that you posted a link to!
February 21, 2005 at 5:20 pm #750983Sean Carney
ParticipantVery nice development I think. The scale is just about right for a town of Letterkennys size, would be nice to see more of this type of bright, modern architecture in ireland, it shows some ambition.
But of course all it gets from you lot is negativity, just like any new proposed development outside of Dublin.
Would not like to invite you all to a party, you would be the most pesamistic, depression bunch of people there. Show some enthuiasm, exuse my spelling!February 21, 2005 at 6:19 pm #750984Mob79
ParticipantHahaha, Its horrible though, you see that‘s the problem. Completely out of proportion in my opinion, would need about 3 or 4 more stories on top for the bottom window to look right.
February 22, 2005 at 5:11 pm #750985J Walker
ParticipantThis is the other part of the development. It is linked to the part in the picture via a vehicular bridge currently under construction.
February 22, 2005 at 7:32 pm #750986Mob79
Participant@J Walker wrote:
This is the other part of the development. It is linked to the part in the picture via a vehicular bridge currently under construction.
Much nicer than the first part shown.
June 23, 2005 at 11:43 am #750987Anonymous
InactiveHas anyone seen this monstrosity now that it’s almost finished?
There’s a nine storey section totally out of scale that dominates the town and is one of the ugliest structures to be erected in a provincial town that I have ever seen.
The architects should be ashamed and the planners fired.June 23, 2005 at 3:02 pm #750988dave123
Participantthe nine storey building looks more like a jail , it atrocious
June 23, 2005 at 4:43 pm #750989J Walker
ParticipantAgreed
I had high hopes for this development at the start but now that it’s up the 9 storey section is nothing short of shocking.
There seems to be absolutely no masterplan for the town with a sprawling uneven retail offering allowed by incompetent planners who have subjected us to dreadful architecture for generations to come.
As a resident it’s depressing to look around at what’s being constructed. I agree the planners should be fired, they’ve neglected their duty to enforce a high standard of urban design.
At least Donegal Town developers seem to have learned from LK’s mistakes
(see attached)
http://www.donegaltimes.com/2005/06_2/frontpage.htmlJune 23, 2005 at 5:48 pm #750990GrahamH
ParticipantAny chance of some pictures you illustrate you views? Thanks.
December 19, 2006 at 9:20 pm #750991 - AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

