Nuzum Bros and the bike factory
- This topic has 12 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 21 years, 6 months ago by
notjim.
- AuthorPosts
- April 15, 2004 at 12:59 pm #706995
notjim
Participantso it seems that tcd is hoping to demolish nuzum bros and the bike factory building next door and even wierder replace it with open space. surely this is stupid, everyone loves those building, the edwarding shop fronts along that edge of tcd are one of the great things about pearse street.
- April 15, 2004 at 2:13 pm #742316
Paul Clerkin
Keymastersource?
- April 15, 2004 at 6:00 pm #742317
notjim
Participantthe student union newpaper _the university record_, and confirmed here
http://www.tcd.ie/Buildings/Presentation/SFC041203/index.html
- April 15, 2004 at 9:47 pm #742318
ro_G
Participantthis is most upsetting
- April 15, 2004 at 10:30 pm #742319
notjim
Participantok, so i realise now that the site i linked above is only accessible from tcd itself, but i’ll relay some of the details when i get to work tomorrow.
- April 15, 2004 at 11:33 pm #742320
Devin
ParticipantYes I heard about that plan too. It is disgraceful that, after neglecting the fine urban vernacular architecture of Pearse Street (in its possession) for so long, TCD should come along and seek to demolish it. As well as the lovely teracotta Nuzum shopfront, I believe those unusual faience columned shofronts (the bricked-up ones) at nos. 183-187 will be up for the chop as well.
- April 16, 2004 at 10:46 am #742321
notjim
Participantso 200 (N&B) and 201 (the bike factory) demolished, 206 demolished, 184-187 (edwarding shopfronts) demolished, 188-193 refurbished, the two white student accomadation blocks by the rugby pitched demolished, the civil engineering building including the nice low victorian building and the awful simon perry building, demolished.
i understand only too well the need to provide modern lab space etc and the desire on the part of the dcc to rejunvinate pearse street, but this is crazy, surely a good architect could find a way to reconcil these needs with retention of these unusual and well loved buildings.
- April 16, 2004 at 12:34 pm #742322
urbanisto
ParticipantTHis is strange considering that DCC are in a process of consultation on proposed environmental changes to Pearse St as part of a QBC development. It would be unthinkable to demolish these buildings (or at least destroy the facades and building line) to create open space! It smacks of the worst excessess of the 1960s
THe DCC plans are available to view in Pearse Library if interested.
- April 16, 2004 at 1:11 pm #742323
Anonymous
InactiveThis cannot be allowed happen. What a disaster it would be. God knows TCD have done nothing to accentuate these clever and attractive old shop fronts but now to want to destroy them is obscene.
The worst thing is the idea of replacing it with public space – as if public space is this great thing that can never be criticised. Well, I’d opt for clever architecture over a ‘clean, chrome lined white limestone’ public space (or whatever else it will be) any day.
Are these buildings listed? Is there anywhere were I can complain to TCD? I’m a graduate and recently received a letter asking for donations – well, I wouldn’t want to donate to an organisation which shows such callous disregard for those few remaining gems of Dublin City.
- April 16, 2004 at 1:34 pm #742324
ro_G
Participanthow far advanced are their plans? – i find it unthinkable they could be doing this
- April 16, 2004 at 1:37 pm #742325
notjim
Participantso, to clarify, from what i understand, the public space will be immeadiately behind where 200 and 201 are now with a gateway stepped back from the steet. the buildings are listed. i would write to john o’hagan, the bursar.
- April 16, 2004 at 1:47 pm #742326
GrahamH
ParticipantI echo everything said; to lose the shopfronts would be awful. To lose the character of this part of the street – essentially buildings that make it a street – would be even worse.
Surely the demolition of structures such as these that shape and define an area into a street, in favour of an open space, would not be permitted under the City Development Plan and hence would not be upheld on appeal by An Bord Pleanala?There’ll be a hell of a lot of objections if this goes ahead.
I cannot believe Trinity have the cheek to do this esp as they’re listed; after years of bashing from everyone they’re still as blind as ever – they just tart up the theatrics to the front and leave the rest to rot. - April 18, 2004 at 11:17 pm #742327
notjim
ParticipantThere is something about the design on the odonnell+toumey website, hard to see from this
the scale of demolishion on pease street, the
side facing the rugby pitch is very nice, again, i am sure the positive aspects of this plan could be reconcilled with retention of 200/201 and 184-188.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.