Blackhall Place Bridge

Home › Forums › Ireland › Blackhall Place Bridge

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 109 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #706200
    JackHack
    Participant

    Interesting to see the building works in progress on the new bridge but it looks kind of odd to see this significant new stucture heading kind of nowhere, Is there a plan to create a new street on the Ushers Island side the bridge, the area on both sides of the new bridge could do with an upgrade, could be great.
    http://images.ireland.com/newspaper/property/0401/bridge.jpg

    #726712
    Paul Clerkin
    Keymaster

    No. The bridge is intended for buses and taxis only afaik, buses going to blanchardstown get it very difficult to turh right onto the next one and hard right again off it before a hard turn left up Blackhall Place.

    Besides “The Dead” house is in the way on the south bank.

    #726713
    Niall
    Participant

    I haven’t seen it lately. How is the work progressing and when is it due to open?

    #726714
    JackHack
    Participant

    “Besides “The Dead” house is in the way..”

    I wonder then do the corp have secret plans.

    But should this House be so important as to prevent the creation of a new street for the public?. Then again it depends on how it would turn out, it would be good if a new street were created on the Axis of the bridge with high quality buildings and an emphasis on the Pedestrian. However if it were just to be a semi-bypass with bland buildings and no community element, I’d be against it.

    Is there any particular reason why Macken st can not be realigned with the proposed bridge there?

    #726715
    Paul Clerkin
    Keymaster

    Was standing beside the site yesterday and the first pieces of painted steelwork is in position.

    #726716
    Michael J. OBrien
    Participant

    Seems to be a huge effort for a bridge that is not going to have access to taxpayers cars. Is it just me of does it look very flat- the bridge in the background is more arched shape- I think it is too flat- wonder what nickname this bridge will get- the eye lash!!

    #726717
    kefu
    Participant

    Hey, Mr Crawford. You seem to know a lot about the goings on in Harland and Wolff. If poss, could you e-mail me at blah@blah.com
    I want to get in touch with you directly, if that would be ok.

    #726718
    Rory W
    Participant

    “Seems to be a huge effort for a bridge that is not going to have access to taxpayers cars”

    There’s more to life than cars Michael – whats wrong with good looking civic design, nothing civic should have to be as Sam Stephenson put it “self effacing like a VD clinic”.

    #726719
    Paul Clerkin
    Keymaster

    I have deleted Darren’s comments on this bridge at his request:”I have since
    received warnings of legal repercussions from Calatrava, Dublin Corp. and
    Harland and Wolf and until this matter is resolved I would appreciate the
    suspension of any posts attributed to me regarding this matter”.

    I would appreciate it if people here could forget they read the comments and refrain from discussing them further.

    #726720
    ChasC
    Participant

    [Mr Crawford. Your statements concerning the Blackhall Place Bridge project are totally irresponsible and inaccurate.In fact some might say bordering on foolhardy. This bridge has been designed by Santiago Calatrava, who you should know, purporting as you are to be a student of architecture, as a very experiencd, well respected design house of international reput. However, I’m sure that the said design house will decide to follow up, or otherwise, with you directly on your opinion. As far as Harland and Wolff are concerned your statements have caused acute embarrassment and potential contractual difficulty, although I accept that you probably did not intend this to be the case. I know that unwanted advice is never welcome but you and your peers would be well advised to consider such things BEFORE committing to print. This is especially the case if and when you do progress to the role of architect or engineer when you will realise how important such contractual issues are, as I’m sure your lecturer will no doubt explain to you.
    Chas Connery – Director of Projects.
    QUOTE]Originally posted by darrancrawford:
    Bridge is being held up due to the extremely bad practice of one Mr S. Calatrava. His bridge is in pieces, on blocks in Harland and Wolffs shipyard in Belfast. It is suffering from multiple failures due to very bad detailling by Calatrava’s office, warnings given by H&W ignored, fundamental mistakes in fabrication were made on the insistance of Calatrava. The bridge’s key anchor points are now the subject of an ongoing wrangle with Calatrava, H&W and Dublin Corp. Put it simply, they are unbuidable and until Calatrava starts to listen to the fabrication experts in H&W the bridge will be indefinately delayed. Tellingly Calatrava have sent numerous bridge builders bankrupt all over Europe due to his poor practice. Betcha never read that in the AR[/QUOTE]

    #726721
    fjp
    Participant

    Well, at the risk of once again being edited, I can only wonder what information is accurate and what is not. I would rather this matter could have been resolved with a clear posting from one side or another, but a legal blackout on the matter???

    Again, I hope this posts stands, and do understand (coming from a legal family) the implications involved for all.

    fjp

    [This message has been edited by fjp (edited 20 April 2002).]

    #726722
    Niall
    Participant

    FROM THE SUNDAY TIMES:

    Design problems halt work on Dublin’s latest bridge
    John Burns

    DUBLIN city council has admitted that a landmark bridge across the River Liffey has been delayed because of serious fabrication problems.
    The Blackhall Place bridge is being designed by Santiago Calatrava, one of the world’s leading bridge-builders, and is being welded together at Harland & Wolff. The Belfast shipyard denied last week that it has clashed with Calatrava over how the bridge should be put together. The difficulties emerged following a visit to the shipyard three weeks ago by architectural students from Queen’s University, Belfast. An engineer involved in the bridge project allegedly told the students that serious mistakes had been made, including welding too-thick plates to too-thin ones.

    Using some “unrepeatable phrases” the engineer is said to have blamed Calatrava for the problems. One student on the tour subsequently posted a detailed account of the comments on the internet.

    The shipyard was furious when it found out that the visit had been reported and, following representations to Queen’s University, the student’s posting has been taken down from the website of the college’s architectural society.

    A spokesman for the shipyard said: “The comments which were attributed to Harland & Wolff have been taken totally out of context by the person who put them on the website.” The shipyard admits there were “minor problems” with the fabrication, but said this was not uncommon on innovative structures. It has no direct relationship with Calatrava, the shipyard said, and none of the delays on the €20m project were its fault.

    Following the revelations, however, Dublin city council conceded that there have been difficulties in “effecting the fabrication of the details” of the 41m by 33m bridge, including questions about the compatibility of welding some sections together.

    Tim Brick, deputy city engineer, said: “There is no denying that there have been tough nuts to crack on the fabrication side. That’s all part and parcel of doing something like this.

    “There have been problems with the fabrication details, and there were questions about the compatibility of welding some sections. This is a detail to be resolved between the designer and contractor on the shop floor.”

    All work stopped on the project for some time while the difficulties were being sorted out, but Harland & Wolff denied that this was for three weeks. Asked who was responsible, Brick said he would not attribute blame to any party until the council got to the bottom of the difficulties. “I would have been surprised if there weren’t problems though,” he said. “We have confidence that they will overcome it.”

    Calatrava, a Spanish architect and engineer, has designed dozens of flamboyant bridges throughout the world, the most spectacular being one across the Guadalquivir in Seville. Some rivals think Calatrava just likes to show off, and invariably his designs are intricate and complicated.

    “The Blackhall bridge is very difficult to build,” said one source involved in the project. “That does not mean it is not buildable. The people who have to fabricate these bridges just sometimes wish that Caltrava would make things easier for them.” Dublin city council said last week that it was very happy with his work.

    Apart from the fabrication difficulties, the Blackhall bridge is also being held up by what Brick described as “nasty foundation problems”. Due to be finished this spring, the Liffey bridge will not now be completed until October.

    The four lane bridge, linking Ellis Quay to Usher’s Island, is intended to carry up to 2,000 cars an hour and aims to distribute north-south city centre traffic more efficiently. The main corridor for such traffic, down O’Connell Street, will be severely restricted when the street is upgraded.

    Constructing Dublin bridges has offered a new lease of life to financially troubled Harland & Wolff, making last week’s controversy all the more embarrassing for the Belfast company.

    The shipyard was subcontracted by Irishenco, an engineering firm, to fabricate the Blackhall bridge and to repair the Ha’penny bridge last year.

    It is also hoping to get the contract to build another north-south link, the Macken Street bridge. Calatrava has also been commissioned by Dublin city council for this project, due to be completed by 2005.

    Calatrava’s office in Zurich was unable to provide a spokesman to discuss Blackhall bridge last week. Irishenco said it and the designer were “working together and things are on target and on course”.

    #726723
    James
    Participant

    Dear Chas C

    Many thanks for livening up what has been a particularly dull and unenlightening discussion site.

    I have particularly enjoyed the edifying spectacle of an eminent ‘Director of Projects’ such as yourself using the sledgehammer of legal threat to crack the particular nut referred to in previous correspondence.

    Incidentally – before we all start reaching for our legal handbooks – on whose part do you act as Director of Projects ? secondly I trust that you have the authority necessary to make such legal threats – thirdly would you care to comment on the Sunday Times Posting of 21 April.

    Finally – notwithstanding the threat of legal action with ensuing dire consequences for all concerned – perhaps you might care to advise on how exactly the comments by a clearly unqualified and unexpert person can possibly have ‘potential contractual consequences’.

    Finally, perhaps you might care to comment on the issues which appear to have never been properly addressed in respect of this bridge – namely the suitability of its design in respect of its location – the degree to which the structure might be regarded as visually intrusive – blocking views to the east and west of the river – Is it true that its design supercedes one prepared by Dublin City Councils Engineers Department which recommended a flat profile which would not have had such onerous implications??.

    I ask these questions merely as an inexpert person – a stranger to all matters of bridge design – who simply cannot understand why it is that the proposed bridge – given the narrow width of the river – has such an apparently elaborate and high profile – if it were possible to erect a flat bed option of minimal visual intrusion.

    Yours etc….

    [This message has been edited by James (edited 21 April 2002).]

    #726724
    Paul Clerkin
    Keymaster

    What is interesting is that a minor piece of information on two very niche and unknown websites can develop because of legal action into a story worthy of the Sunday Times. I think John Burns is actually registered to post here, but I imagine if HW hadnt complained, this piece of information would have simply faded from view.

    A lesson to everyone that sometimes the legal approach creats bigger problems.

    #726725
    fjp
    Participant

    That’s actually a very satisfactory resolution to this matter. And I presume this means we can all discuss it freely again (damn them lawya’s and their medlin’).

    But it’s a but of a shame that archeire didn’t get a proper plug out of it.

    fjp

    #726726
    Paul Clerkin
    Keymaster

    Actually I’m not too disappointed, its hard enough to get information out of architects, but if they though we were a conduit for confidential information it would be so much harder.

    I assume we can continue to discuss everything bar the information Darren niavely divulged. If I hear otherwise in this mornings post I’ll let you all know.

    #726727
    Paul Clerkin
    Keymaster

    And you know whats really funny…

    HW wanted this swept under the carpet so they leaned on Darren

    this created a story for John Burns so it was in the Sunday Times

    Now I have a mailinglist (2300 subscribers) with the news stories, so it goes in it.

    There are a few american based general architecture news mailinglists who are subscribed and it will end up on their mailshots this afternoon…..

    And the circle continues….

    HW should have stayed quiet

    #726728
    Rory W
    Participant

    Yep – as someone who works in marketing/PR I’d have to say they blew it on this one!

    #726729
    Paul Clerkin
    Keymaster

    Back to the bridge, over the weekend there was a trailer parked on Victoria Quay with what looked like a segment of the pedestrain section sitting on it…. Hasnt been any movment on-site for at least the last few weeks so it looks like they’d delivered some more pieces.

    #726730
    LOB
    Participant

    Any further progress on this
    Have not been down that direction for a bit

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 109 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.