Stack A
- This topic has 133 replies, 38 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 4 months ago by
wearnicehats.
- AuthorPosts
- August 3, 2002 at 11:56 am #705634
kefu
ParticipantThe entire river-facing facade of Stack A has been demolished. I don’t know whether this was known about or when it was done, but certainly within the past week or two.
August 5, 2002 at 7:48 pm #720416Paul Clerkin
Keymaster
I believe it is to be glazed.
August 6, 2002 at 11:45 am #720417kefu
ParticipantWhen I went back by it again, glass seemed the likely conclusion.
It could be good because the internal roof structure is impressive.
At least it wasn’t one of the famous Bank Holiday demolitions.August 6, 2002 at 12:45 pm #720418ew
ParticipantSouthern end wasn’t much to look at anyway as it had been chopped of to widen the road and was replaced with a brick wall.
One of the policys in restoring this protected structure is to “remove the late 19th century intervention at the southern facade of the warehouse and provide a more suitable termination of the building on the quayside.”
Last I heard it was to be glass alright.
The roof is spectacular – The shadows and light interact nicely as you pass by along the quays now taht you can see in.
Photos:
http://64.78.50.172//uploads/pdfs/Stack%20A%20for%20web.pdfDetails:
http://64.78.50.172/uploads/pdfs/StackAConservPlan.pdfAugust 9, 2002 at 2:48 pm #720419LOB
ParticipantFound this in a press release from Oct 2001 from the DDDA (on their site)
August 13, 2002 at 6:48 pm #720420notjim
ParticipantThey are putting a pedestrian bridge across too:
August 13, 2002 at 7:01 pm #720421emf
ParticipantNothing to do with Stack A but are the DDDA planning to do anything about their offices? They stick out like a sore thumb at the moment especially with the Campshires now completed and more so when the bridge etc. are completed!
August 27, 2002 at 2:49 pm #720422BillJ
ParticipantI notice that a detail not obvious from the water-colour sketch is that the original wrought-iron and slate cap-roof is being replaced with corregated aluminium sheets.
This strikes me as cheap-and-nasty not conservation, it also looks terrible.August 27, 2002 at 6:51 pm #720423michaellynas
ParticipantBillj, the corregated aluminium sheets you have seen are the Kingspan insulation which is being fixed to the original structure and the original slate placed on top on batons. The watercolour is now out of date but the glass front is correct, this will actually go down to basement level in a well to expose the vaults.
January 23, 2004 at 1:20 pm #720424notjim
Participantthis is looking really beautifull now, from across the river you can see the fantastic interior wrought-iron work.
January 23, 2004 at 3:00 pm #720425Anonymous
InactiveOver time there have been many proposals for the Georges Dock area.
From Abercrombie’s plan to drain the dock and build a covered car park right through to Dermot Desmonds ambitous eco-sphere on the site of Stack A.
As a preservationist I am happy to see this project nearing completion, and I am even happier that the end wall has been opened up. I presume it will entice many passers by in from the quays.
A photo would be great
January 23, 2004 at 3:44 pm #720426Anonymous
InactivePreferably a photo without that architectural gem known as Jury’s;)
January 23, 2004 at 5:35 pm #720427Anonymous
InactiveNow it is called CHQ. Stack A does not suit its new upmarket shopping image!
January 26, 2004 at 12:37 am #720428Devin
ParticipantNeither does CHQ. They obviously want a catchy name for the yuppies: “Eau-kay (D4 accent), oi’ll see yeau at CHQ”. But I don’t know if it works.
January 26, 2004 at 12:39 am #720429notjim
Participanti was suprised they changed the name; stack a sounds great.
January 26, 2004 at 12:52 am #720430Devin
ParticipantYeah, Stack A was better.
January 26, 2004 at 11:48 am #720431d_d_dallas
ParticipantAnyone see an article from Sunday on DDDA’s about turn for the shopping element for the development (can’t remember which paper – sorry). Basically it’s now going to be just homewares and a snooty wine shop! Yeah – that will really pull in the punters on a Saturday. I can’t help but feel that giving the entire space over to Harvey Nichols would have been a better option – that would really be a draw for people to head that direction on the weekends when the IFSC is dead.
January 26, 2004 at 9:23 pm #720432GrahamH
ParticipantStack A is way better, gritty, industrial etc etc
As for Jurys – why, how, I mean…
And is that aggregate concrete facing the ground floor?January 27, 2004 at 3:12 pm #720433Anonymous
InactiveI agree that Stack A is a better name, much more authentic and a better description of the project.
I think that the marketting of the project to UK retail has influenced the name in an attempt to market this as Canary Wharf Dublin.
Ask your typical Irish person where the Custom house is they know, but I suspect few would know that the Quay goes as far as North Wall Quay.
I think that in the longer term it will be good (apart from the name) as it should attract new retail and move the IFSC away from it’s current selection of Spars and Centras.
I believe that in Spencer Dock there is going to be a ban on Spars and Centras, according to Rob Ticknell of Treasury the retail element will be carefully selected to ensure a higher standard of retail content.
January 27, 2004 at 3:23 pm #720434Anonymous
InactiveIs that a subtle way of getting a select clientel?
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

