Giant sculpture to be located in Liffey

Re: Giant sculpture to be located in Liffey

Postby jdivision » Sat Dec 12, 2009 4:45 am

Liffey man is a DDDA project. No private developer would have come out with this out of nowhere for no obvious reason.
jdivision
Senior Member
 
Posts: 802
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 4:34 pm

Re: Giant sculpture to be located in Liffey

Postby lostexpectation » Sun May 02, 2010 9:10 pm

lostexpectation
Senior Member
 
Posts: 566
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 6:38 pm

Re: Giant sculpture to be located in Liffey

Postby Global Citizen » Mon May 03, 2010 12:25 am

lostexpectation wrote:so call we call him dead


Oh yes please.
Global Citizen
Member
 
Posts: 197
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:23 am
Location: Global

Re: Giant sculpture to be located in Liffey

Postby Bren88 » Mon May 03, 2010 12:40 am

Even if they had the money, it would be foolish to go ahead with it now.
Personally, I've no problem with these modern mega statues
Bren88
Member
 
Posts: 389
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 1:47 am

Re: Giant sculpture to be located in Liffey

Postby Global Citizen » Mon May 03, 2010 1:49 am

Bren88 wrote:Personally, I've no problem with these modern mega statues


Nor do I if such works are displayed in a suitable location.
And in this instance the location is far from suitable.

I actually like this particular piece but feel it would be much more at home
on one of the approaches to the city (like the Angel of the North) rather
than dominating the heart of Dublin.

I'm also uncomfortable with the fact that this work is modelled on the sculptor.
I've nothing against Antony Gormley but I would never be able to look at this
piece without thinking of it as a giant self inflicted homage to the London sculptor in the middle of Dublin.

And with his compatriot Ian Ritchie's spire only a short distance away, one could be forgiven for thinking
that Dublin city centre has become a showcase for early 21st century British sculpture on a grand scale.

Surely thats what Birmingham is for.
Global Citizen
Member
 
Posts: 197
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:23 am
Location: Global

Re: Giant sculpture to be located in Liffey

Postby lostexpectation » Mon May 03, 2010 2:00 pm

really don't get the problem with it being very very basically modelled on the nearest human form the sculpturer can find, theres much craft in it.

problem i would have is not with the sculpture, but with the idea of the DDDA 'bestowing' this on dublin, and all the self congratulations that would go with it, it would stick in my craw, maybe they'll bring it back and 'don a green jersey on it'?
lostexpectation
Senior Member
 
Posts: 566
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 6:38 pm

Re: Giant sculpture to be located in Liffey

Postby Bago » Mon May 03, 2010 2:39 pm

Would Michelangelo's David be the same if he'd modelled it on himself?
Personally i think i'd prefer see a classical adonis than a slightly overweight collosal middleage man sullenly looking at the river. It's scale is too large for something so vague, unemotive and pointless. What's it a celebration of?... mid life crisis!
Bago
Member
 
Posts: 116
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 4:04 pm
Location: Dublin

Re: Giant sculpture to be located in Liffey

Postby Bren88 » Tue May 04, 2010 8:09 am

Global Citizen wrote:I'm also uncomfortable with the fact that this work is modelled on the sculptor.
I've nothing against Antony Gormley but I would never be able to look at this
piece without thinking of it as a giant self inflicted homage to the London sculptor in the middle of Dublin.

That's nonsense. You make it sound as if AG imposed himself on Dublin.

Almost all of Gormley's pieces deal with the human form, and most are modeled on himself. Purely for proportions. But not have any personal features. This one was possibly contained the least amount of human features.

To be honest, the nationality, or race of an artist doesn't even enter my mind. I thought we, as a society, were passed such petty nonsense. Even for those that are bothered by such petty nonsense, surely the son of an irishman is better than no connection at all.
Bren88
Member
 
Posts: 389
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 1:47 am

Re: Giant sculpture to be located in Liffey

Postby Global Citizen » Tue May 04, 2010 12:00 pm

Bren88 wrote:That's nonsense. You make it sound as if AG imposed himself on Dublin.

Almost all of Gormley's pieces deal with the human form, and most are modeled on himself. Purely for proportions. But not have any personal features. This one was possibly contained the least amount of human features.

To be honest, the nationality, or race of an artist doesn't even enter my mind. I thought we, as a society, were passed such petty nonsense. Even for those that are bothered by such petty nonsense, surely the son of an irishman is better than no connection at all.


Please don't try conjuring up a silly race argument from my comments. If you are going to quote me, at least have the decency to put my words in context. I did say that I do like the piece.

Its the proposed location I take issue with. I have no problem with the nationality of the artist. But with the Spire already in place, I think the addition of this sculpture nearby would represent a disappointing lack of confidence in Irish artists.

If you are an individual who finds any hint of critisism of a foreigner worthy of the word racist, then your collection of picked nits must be very impressive indeed.
Global Citizen
Member
 
Posts: 197
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:23 am
Location: Global

Re: Giant sculpture to be located in Liffey

Postby Bren88 » Wed May 05, 2010 2:11 am

Global Citizen wrote:Please don't try conjuring up a silly race argument from my comments. If you are going to quote me, at least have the decency to put my words in context. I did say that I do like the piece.

I know you like it, it was me you agreed with earlier.
But I find your comments regarding context rather ironic considering you went on to say;

If you are an individual who finds any hint of critisism of a foreigner worthy of the word racist, then your collection of picked nits must be very impressive indeed.

FFS, get a grip. I never mentioned the word racist, in regards to you or any one.
I said his race/nationality isn't an issue for me. Once installed, I consider large public projects or buildings as belonging to the city and no longer the artist (and I don't refer simply to ownership). The design can be referenced to them, they contributed etc, but it is the city's icon.

The statue of liberty is belongs to New York, no Bartholdi (sp?)
The Spire is Dublin's, weather we want it or not.
And Gormley has certainly lost the Angel to Tyne side

Its the proposed location I take issue with. I have no problem with the nationality of the artist. But with the Spire already in place, I think the addition of this sculpture nearby would represent a disappointing lack of confidence in Irish artists.

To be fair, maybe Irish artists submitted entries too, the standard, from everyone, was terrible.


Global Citizen wrote:....... without thinking of it as a giant self inflicted homage to the London sculptor in the middle of Dublin.

It could be worse
Bren88
Member
 
Posts: 389
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 1:47 am

Re: Giant sculpture to be located in Liffey

Postby wearnicehats » Wed May 05, 2010 1:09 pm

after initial derision the Gateshead Flasher has been generally accepted as a successful piece - principally because it had all the lements there in the beginning to be so.

I look at this one and I see some guy slouching with his feet in a puddle staring off to sea as if he's desperate to be somewhere else (which he probably is). It would stand as a fairly good analogy to the current times but I'm glad it's been binned - feckin miserable thing
wearnicehats
Senior Member
 
Posts: 820
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 2:38 pm

Re: Giant sculpture to be located in Liffey

Postby Bren88 » Fri May 07, 2010 7:35 am

wearnicehats wrote:after initial derision the Gateshead Flasher has been generally accepted as a successful piece - principally because it had all the lements there in the beginning to be so.


To be fair, she donned a newcastle jersey with shearer on the back, so that pretty much sealed the deal.


Look at it this way, the proposal is binned, fine.
At least Gormley gave dublin a better shot than Seatle, where he proposed the strangle titled "ejaculating man". I wonder was it also modeled on himself.
Bren88
Member
 
Posts: 389
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 1:47 am

Re: Giant sculpture to be located in Liffey

Postby PVC King » Sun May 30, 2010 10:59 am

FT Article on Gormley


Lunch with the FT: Antony Gormley
By Jackie Wullschlager

Published: May 28 2010 16:22 | Last updated: May 28 2010 16:22

On a warm spring day, a giant in a fluorescent yellow jacket and woolly hat strides into the Lord Stanley, a wood-panelled gastro-pub in Camden, north London. A head and shoulders taller than everyone else, Antony Gormley gazes effortlessly over the throng of drinkers at his local and hastens to our table. He has a long mobile face and darting eyes behind square silver glasses. He gives me a peck on each cheek and places a solicitous hand on my arm. “Hello, how has your day been so far?” he opens. “Can I get you a drink?”

It is a vicarish approach, anxious to appear easy-going, one of the crowd. I tell him the FT pays for lunch. He requests a lemonade and peels off his cyclist’s gear, revealing dark hair flecked with grey and couldn’t-care-less clothes – brown turtle-neck jumper, beige trousers. Without further ado, he produces a catalogue for a recent show from his rucksack and shows me a diagram of a triangle within a triangle. “You see, this is so beautiful! I said to Roger Penrose [professor of mathematics at Oxford], ‘I’ve been dealing with this bubble geometry and I’m not making much sense of it, can you help?’ He was an absolute joy, so open-minded, he spent hours taking me through this jungle of possibilities.”

I try to interest Gormley in the blackboard menu but he lingers on the trisector theorem illustration, summarising rapidly: “If you trisect a triangle’s angles internally, the intersections provide the vertices of a smaller triangle. Whatever the original shape, the smaller triangle will be equilateral. It shows the relationship of the random to the absolute.”

Is Gormley a philosopher? He is aware that “either my work can be seen as really bad figurative sculpture, or as a provocation to a state of reflection”. Few artists divide audiences in more complex ways. He is seen by some as a traditional sculptor of the human form, and by others as a cutting-edge conceptualist – and he’s admired or loathed on both counts. He is popular with the public but has equally attracted opprobrium from the critical establishment for the very accessibility of works such as “Angel of the North”, his massive motorway landmark, or “Field”, an installation of 40,000 clay-sized figurines made with a community in St Helen’s, Merseyside, for which he won the Turner Prize in 1994. Last year’s “One and Other” for Trafalgar Square’s Fourth Plinth, won widespread acclaim. So has “Event Horizon”, the recent installation of fibreglass and iron sculptures of a naked man across New York’s skyline, a reprise of the event in London in 2007.

Test Sites, opening at London’s White Cube next week, brings Gormley’s conversations between architecture, geometry and the human body into the gallery. It includes massive blocks of rusted iron, which aim “to make the condition of architecture absolutely apparent as a way of describing the body”, and a space frame: “a drawing but also an object – virtual but also real. It’s a forest of verticality, a 3D hologram but somehow you’re part of it.” The viewer edges his way through the frame in total darkness until, on a timed cycle, blinding light floods the room, recalling the installation “Blind Light” at London’s Hayward Gallery in 2007. “It’s intensely uncomfortable – what was illusory becomes visual, and you find yourself up against your fellow men. It’s very experiential – very scary. When I showed a version in New York, people became totally freaked out.” He imitates an east coast twang: “Turn those lights off!”

Why put people through it like this? “[The philosopher Edmund] Burke said there’s no beauty without terror. I want people to react by saying, ‘What the hell is this?’, then become the object and ask the same question.” This insistence on putting the spotlight on the viewer makes Gormley a modern-day grand inquisitor, an interrogator of souls.

Certainly his uncompromising conceptual focus is matched by asceticism at lunch. With barely a glance at the Mediterranean-leaning menu of meat and fish, he selects the cheapest thing on it – a vegetable risotto. Neither starter nor desert are contenders. The waiter suggests an accompanying green salad; I order an onion tart.

Gormley, 60, is lean and fit and puts himself through extreme physical trial in the bedrock of his art: casting moulds from his own body. “The idea of making a surrogate body or getting someone else to do what I can legitimately use myself to do – I couldn’t do that,” he says. “It’s my moment of truth. If there’s a truth claim in the work, it’s not an interpretation of life but that it comes from a lived moment in time. I may be applying logical and conceptual principles of the mind/body problem, but this is not expressive. I’m trying to tell things as they are – as evidence of something actual. It’s the thing people kill me for.”

He means, I think, the underlay of human figuration as a basis for conceptual art. Why has this provoked such vehement responses? “I’ve been battling this all my life. There’s a sense that somehow the work is unaccepted within the canon because it’s still going on about the body. There are people who characterise my project as a one-shout idea. But you don’t criticise a dancer for using his body. People seem to make a connection with the work. The body is capable of transcending creed, race, language, to tell of human experience including thought, feeling, indeed the fact of human existence. We need images of the body now as much as we have ever needed them and no one knows how to make them make sense.”

It is not too hard to read this offering of his body – and a certain petulance that the meaning of the sacrifice is not universally acknowledged – in terms of Gormley’s rigorously Roman Catholic upbringing. “Oh, yes, there was lots of kneeling in dark places praying to non-existent gods,” he says, but most seminal – though nothing to do with religion – are memories as a child of seven or eight of “the experience of the enforced sleep – being made to go to sleep when I wasn’t tired between two and three in broad daylight. That’s when I got to know the body as a place, not a thing. It was a feeling of incredible claustrophobia. I remember the metal-balconied room in the middle of our house in Hampstead Garden Suburb, facing south. It was incredibly hot, bright, pink, the size of a matchbox, completely suffocating. I felt almost sick with nausea from its confinement. The slow release from that into a space that was dark, cool and infinite – I got used to having that experience. The tiny room opened out, turned into something without dimensions. I can’t think of anything that I have made that doesn’t refer to that or hasn’t come out of it.”

The food arrives. My tart, served with potato and walnut salad, is rich and robustly flavoured with rosemary. Gormley takes forkfuls of risotto, a fresh, creamy-looking concoction of morels, peas, broad beans and basil, without interest. Was his childhood happy? “Not really – but it wasn’t sad either,” he answers, as if the question were irrelevant. Antony Mark David Gormley – the initials AMDG are, not coincidentally, those you encounter in churches across Europe, where they stand for Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam, to the greater glory of God – was born in 1950, seventh child in an affluent family. His father was manager of a pharmaceutical company and a “captain of industry” who “had a passion for 15th-century paintings”. He was also, says Gormley, “a maniac. He was hopeless – he believed in discipline but I’m not sure that he was particularly disciplined. Motivation is very difficult to pin down. With my father, although he took my scribbled poems to his secretary and brought them back typed out, there was always a sense that nothing was quite good enough. The whole family suffered from the feeling that in his view the potential of one’s offerings was not quite adequate.”

At Ampleforth, a Catholic boarding school in north Yorkshire, Gormley “made a radio, a boat, a sandyacht”; monks “listened to my poems and helped me find the right paints – I have a lot to be thankful for in my education.” He read architecture and anthropology at Cambridge, then travelled in India, where he developed an interest in Buddhism that has remained a constant. He did not set out to be an artist: “I wouldn’t have had that presumption or assumption. It was only when I realised it was the only conclusion to who I was. I was three months off 30 when I came out of art college. I kept my options open a long time. And I have been very wilful.” After art school – Central St Martin’s, Goldsmiths and the Slade – he worked and lived in Peckham, south London, for years with painter Vicken Parsons. “Such an amazing wife and mother,” he says, “and still my best critic, merciless and very good.” The couple have three children: filmmaker Ivo; Guy, who studied sculpture at Goldsmiths; and architect Paloma. “They are so brilliant and interesting. I say that with no sense of self-congratulation. It’s been none of my business but I’m intensely proud of them.”

Our main courses finished, Gormley eats his way dutifully through the salad. The pub is heaving but nothing distracts him; he speaks warmly of younger generations of artists. His own cohort includes Tony Cragg, Peter Randall-Page, Bill Woodrow and his great rival Anish Kapoor. Though the two no longer talk to each other, Gormley says Kapoor “still makes extraordinary, challenging things”. But, he says, “That generation has been eclipsed, quite rightly, by the very lively Thatcher’s children [the Young British Artists]. They were able to do what we couldn’t dream of – we were happy to wait for galleries and institutions to take an interest while we showed our work shyly to each other. They said, ‘We are going to take control of our destinies’ and I take my hat off to them.”

Although he considers that “Damien [Hirst] is a natural philosopher”, he distinguishes his generation from the rest of the YBAs because “there is a really deep thing for us – of thinking about the issue of where sculpture fits with the world of made things and perhaps a bit wider – an expectation that you would set the terms of your own project and articulate it as well. You had to chart your journey but also the reason for the voyage in the first place.”

Although his admirations tend to the abstract – Malevich, Pollock and Serra – a crucial point in Gormley’s journey was the “revelation” of encountering Jacob Epstein. “After seeing Epstein, I felt I didn’t have a choice. He dealt with sex, procreation, death. Epstein made a pregnant woman, Moore made a Madonna. Moore had holes but not many vaginas and giant schlongs wapping around.” Gormley waves his arms suggestively. “You don’t see many tumescent penises in Moore. Epstein was filled with American vigour and a call for this primary language of direct carving. He infected the world. While English painting was dealing with formal issues, Epstein was dealing with the question, ‘Is the human project going to last?’”

This, updated to an environmentally threatened and technology-led age, is the question posed by Gormley’s art, too – most recently in the 390ft sculpture of a naked man, engineered as a minimalist pylon, which he proposed for the Olympic commission. We are meeting soon after this was rejected in favour of Kapoor’s “ArcelorMittal Orbit”, and days after the Sunday Times published an illustration based on its own artist’s impression rather than on Gormley’s actual proposal – and he invites me to see the “true Olympic model”. I apologise on behalf of my profession, and try to prolong lunch. His lemonade never arrived, so I reorder and he downs it hastily. I pay the bill and we walk five minutes to his warehouse-studio.

Did he expect to win the Olympic commission? “I didn’t think they could possibly fail to appreciate that this is what the Olympics needs,” he answers wryly, showing me how viewers would have been invited to climb the man-pylon. “It would have been approachable but also an experience – the framing of a situation in which the viewer becomes the viewed. It’s a collective approach, where participation is essential to make a new moving body. It’s the industrial sublime, a mountain you climb in the city.”

Gormley is a paradox: a minimalist and also a romantic; an abstract thinker whose work turns on the human figure; a giant ego who denies individual expression but instals casts of his own body worldwide as Everyman. “The work is driving me, evolving and I’m keeping up with it – it makes enormous demands not just on me but on everyone who helps.” Again the absolutism, inclusiveness, recall the Catholic ideal, yet I wonder if Gormley is an optimist?

“Well, no. I probably suffer from melancholy, but we have to believe if the sun has got 6bn years of energy left, we have a part to play. I make contemporary megalithic markers in time and space. Leaving a record of human experience beyond the time when we’re talking to ourselves is a primary urge. We’re insignificant. I’m attracted to sculpture that recognises that. Most culture is a reaction to amnesia – not just human memory but the way whole galaxies disappear into black holes – cosmic amnesia. Sculpture is a railing against that.”

Antony Gormley, ‘Test Sites’, White Cube Mason’s Yard, London SW1, June 4-July 10. ‘Event Horizon’, New York, to August 15. ‘Critical Mass’, De La Warr Pavilion, Bexhill-on-Sea, until August

.................................


Any thoughts?
PVC King
 

Re: Giant sculpture to be located in Liffey

Postby nialldebuitlear » Thu Jul 22, 2010 3:29 pm

I'm not a supporter of the sculpture particularly but the objections about this being a representation of the artist are absurd. His sculptures are clearly not self-portraits.

No one who has seen Antony Gormley could call him overweight the man is thin as rake - ridiculous
nialldebuitlear
Member
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 6:52 pm

Re: Giant sculpture to be located in Liffey

Postby nialldebuitlear » Thu Jul 22, 2010 3:30 pm

Image
nialldebuitlear
Member
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 6:52 pm

Re: Giant sculpture to be located in Liffey

Postby lostexpectation » Fri Jul 23, 2010 10:22 pm

see he's taller and thinner, its the nearest human form to hand why not
lostexpectation
Senior Member
 
Posts: 566
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 6:38 pm

Re: Giant sculpture to be located in Liffey

Postby shed » Tue Aug 17, 2010 3:55 pm

Perhaps they will resurrect Gormleys sculpture and it could be integrated with the Suas (ie Liffey cable car scheme) with below as the inspiration!;)
http://www.choishine.com/port_projects/landsnet/landsnet.html
shed
Member
 
Posts: 35
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 7:43 pm

Re: Giant sculpture to be located in Liffey

Postby PVC King » Tue Aug 17, 2010 7:50 pm

That is an exceptionally inovative approach to an energy project!

Could have a very relevant second spin on the Scottish Highland Interconnector to move wind and wave generated power to core Scotland and massage some of the reservations held by conservationists about standard pylons being completely unsuited to a pristine landscape..

That use surprises, another Gormley standard man in river or urban/semi urban location would not surprise or excite.
PVC King
 

Previous

Return to Ireland



cron