Council to seek court order to demolish Navan house

[Frank Taylor]

*Are you a Planning Consultant by any chance, Frank?

No, I just think there is a wide gap in the prosecution's logic.

We may yet be talking in RL with a mind like that.

What is RL?

[David Murray]

Well, there is a high court decision on this matter now.

[PVC King]

The sad fact is that IF mr Murray is not solvent that the taxpayer or banks will carry the can IF. the project originator gets to walk away under court protection from creditors. If he his not solvent then it should simply be repossessed and sold with any equity after court and council costs handed back; returning the land to agricultural use would be wanton in this climate. Whatever happens continued residence under these circumstances is a total non-runner.

[hutton]

588 square metres with no planning? This structure is a symptom of the ills that begot this country as a whole over the last decade - a big greedy unsustainable unnecessary material aspiration that celebrated giving two fingers to the rest of civic society, and as with the climate from which it emerged, it too now comes crashing down...