Car-less Development

Car-less Development

Postby what? » Thu Oct 15, 2009 2:44 pm

Does anybody know of any residential developments (thinking groups of houses not apartment blocks) that have no off-street parking around Dublin City?

Im trying to look for some precedents.

thanks.
what?
 
Posts: 427
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 12:18 pm
Location: Dublin

Re: Car-less Development

Postby henno » Thu Oct 15, 2009 7:40 pm

tried to argue this in the town centre of a laois town... failed miserably...
henno
Senior Member
 
Posts: 540
Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 12:07 pm

Re: Car-less Development

Postby missarchi » Thu Oct 15, 2009 8:28 pm

I taking a risky stab at it but I remember a development in Hanbury Lane dublin 8 yellowish brick 4 or so stories... But I cannot remember what is down the very small lane.
missarchi
Old Master
 
Posts: 1796
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 7:53 pm

Re: Car-less Development

Postby goneill » Fri Oct 16, 2009 10:53 am

Swan Mews, off Morehamton Road D4, by Clery and Hall (mid-70s?). Also there have been a number of mews developments which pretend to have off street parking but where the garage has been discreetly converted to better use.
goneill
Member
 
Posts: 160
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 5:36 pm

Re: Car-less Development

Postby wearnicehats » Fri Oct 16, 2009 1:16 pm

what? wrote:Does anybody know of any residential developments (thinking groups of houses not apartment blocks) that have no off-street parking around Dublin City?

Im trying to look for some precedents.

thanks.


it contradicts the development plan so I doubt you'll find any
wearnicehats
Senior Member
 
Posts: 820
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 2:38 pm

Re: Car-less Development

Postby johnglas » Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:16 pm

This does raise the interesting issue of whether 'off-street' parking should be universally required. Who develops development plans, if not planners? Why do 'traffic' (i.e. motorised transport) issues so dominate development plans? Why is there no access off single-carriageway, non-distributor roads?What happened to townscape, community, enclosure? The number of developments featuring culs-de-sac, houses with their backs to the road bounded by cheap fencing, and acres of 'leftover' space are all down to the roads engineers. How do they get away with it?
johnglas
Senior Member
 
Posts: 864
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 12:43 am
Location: Glasgow, Scotland

Re: Car-less Development

Postby missarchi » Mon Oct 19, 2009 2:12 am

missarchi
Old Master
 
Posts: 1796
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 7:53 pm

Re: Car-less Development

Postby tommyt » Mon Oct 19, 2009 2:29 pm

what? wrote:Does anybody know of any residential developments (thinking groups of houses not apartment blocks) that have no off-street parking around Dublin City?

Im trying to look for some precedents.

thanks.


There is a block of 11 small 1/2 bed apartments for 'empty nesters' built in Dunlaoghaire /Monkstown Farm at the junction of Oliver Plunkett Road/Mounttown road that have no off street parking, they are for people who hand back their council houses and is the only exception I would be aware of and obviously for a very specifc demographic.

As stated by others it would contravene every Dev Plan in the country. Even heritage towns like Kinsale have strict compulsory provision for off street parking. I would be stumped to think of anywhere else- maybe the Green Building , Temple Lane in Temple Bar, D2- but that was more of an experimental development in the early 90s, -maybe it even has parking allocated somewhere in the vicinity?
tommyt
Member
 
Posts: 455
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 7:39 pm
Location: D5

news:Iran Won't Halt Enrichment Even If It Gets Fuel

Postby exactman » Tue Oct 20, 2009 7:38 am

Iranian state-run Press TV cited unnamed officials in Tehran as saying the Islamic Republic was looking to hold on to its low-enriched uranium and buying what it needed for the Tehran reactor abroad.The report indicated that Iran will not meet terms the West said it agreed to — including transferring most of its stock of enriched uranium, the potential base for fissile warhead material. Tehran says it needs enriched uranium for nuclear fuel."Buying nuclear fuel from abroad does not mean Iran will stop its uranium enrichment activities inside the country," Ali Shirzadian, spokesman for Iran's Atomic Energy Organization, told Iran's official IRNA news agency."If the talks do not bring about Iran's desired result ... we will start to make 19.7 percent enriched uranium ourselves," Shirzadian told Reuters a few hours before the talks were due to start.The U.S. says Iran is now one to six years away from being able to make such arms, should it choose to.Meanwhile, the head of the U.N. nuclear agency says talks with Iran's International Atomic Energy Agency delegation were off to a"good start" in Vienna.Mohamed El Baradei, who heads the International Atomic Energy Agency, attended the first day of talks Monday. He spoke of "quite a constructive meeting.""We are off to a good start," Baradei said.Even if Tehran agrees, it could still try to resist pressure to hand over most of its stock in one batch, insisting instead on sending small amounts out of the country. Iran still has enough fuel for the Tehran reactor to last until mid-2011.Monday's Vienna talks between Tehran and the U.S., Russia and France, focused on the technical issue with huge strategic ramifications.Progress would strengthen confidence on the part of the U.S. and five other big powers trying to persuade Iran to dispel fears about its nuclear program that this time Tehran is serious about reducing tensions and ready to build on Oct. 1 Geneva talks with six world powers.Beyond that, it could give the international community more negotiating space by delaying Tehran's ability to turn what is now a civilian uranium enrichment program into an assembly line producing fissile warhead materialThe talks Monday will attempt to implement what Western officials say Iran agreed to during the Geneva talks; letting a foreign country — most likely Russia — turn most of its low-enriched uranium into higher grades to fuel its small research reactor in Tehran.That would mean turning over more than 1,200 kilograms of low-enriched uranium — more than 2,600 pounds and as much as 75 percent of Iran's declared stockpile. Tentative plans are for further enrichment in Russia and then conversion in France into metal fuel rods for the Tehran reactor.Iranian agreement to such terms would be significant because 1,000 kilograms is the commonly accepted threshold of the amount of low-enriched uranium needed for production of weapons-grade uranium enriched to levels above 90 percent.Based on the present Iranian stockpile, the U.S. has estimated that Tehran could produce a nuclear weapon between 2010 and 2015, an assessment that broadly jibes with those from Israel and other nations tracking Tehran's nuclear program.If most of Iran's declared stock is taken out of the country, further enriched abroad and then turned into fuel for the Tehran reactor, any effort to make nuclear weapons would be delayed until Iran again has enriched enough material to turn into weapons-grade uranium."It buys some time," said David Albright of the Washington-based IISS, which has closely tracked Iran for signs of any covert proliferation. But Albright added that Iran could replace even 1,200 kilograms of low-enriched uranium "in little over a year" at its present rate of enrichmentps:Casually recommend a knockoffs handbags online shophttp://www.onreplicas.com,it sales Chloe fake handbags,AH fake bags ,Fendi fake bags ......
exactman
Member
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am


Return to Irish Planning Matters



cron