ABP allow Chapel at Dublin hospital to be demolished

ABP allow Chapel at Dublin hospital to be demolished

Postby wearnicehats » Tue Jul 20, 2010 9:26 am

IT yesterday

A NINETEENTH-century chapel is due to be demolished following a decision by An Bord Pleanála to allow construction on the St James’s Hospital campus in Dublin.

The chapel, built in the 1890s, will be demolished to allow for the development of an eight-storey, 196-bed private hospital, on a 1.148 hectare site, located on the existing campus.

The chapel is thought to be connected with the South Dublin Union workhouses on the southside of Dublin’s inner city, which was one of the main sites of the 1916 Easter Rising.

In January, Synchrony Properties was granted permission by Dublin City Council to develop the facility, which will employ 400 people during its construction and have about 545 full-time staff when completed.

Local residents and a number of local politicians opposed the council’s decision to approve the plans and made an appeal to An Bord Pleanála, which upheld the original decision in favour of development.

In its ruling, the board stated that the development of a “high quality hospital” justified the proposed demolition of the chapel because it was not listed under the Record of Protected Structures (RPS). However, the ruling stipulates that the developers must pay an insurance bond of €1 million to ensure the demolition process coincides with the commencement of work on the new development.

Labour TD Mary Upton was one of the appellants along with her party colleague councillor John Gallagher. Ms Upton said she was “absolutely horrified” that the council halted their decision to list the chapel as a protected structure.

Mr Gallagher said the council’s south-central area committee had agreed in May 2008 to begin the process for listing the chapel RPS. The proposal to list the chapel as a protected structure was “unanimously agreed upon” and should then have gone before a full city council meeting, where it would “almost certainly have been passed”, added Mr Gallagher.

Council officials have a role in the preparation of reports which recommend whether a building is included on the record, but the addition or deletion of a structure on the RPS is a reserved function of city councillors.

Dublin City Council documents show senior officials halted the proposal to make the chapel a protected structure, after they were made aware of the significance of its location and its obstruction to development on the campus.

The council reversed its decision to add the chapel to the RPS less than one month after the chief executive of St James’s Hospital protested against the proposal.

In March 2008, a conservation officer working for the council said the chapel held significant historical, architectural and social value, which merited its inclusion on the record. However, in August of that year, the same conservation officer reversed the decision “in light of the arguments put forward” by the hospital official, which disputed the chapel’s historical significance.

In a letter, the chief executive officer of the hospital said the protection of the chapel would obstruct development on the site, which would prevent the implementation of Government and HSE strategy to deliver healthcare facilities.

A statement from the city council said the process of listing the chapel as a protected site was halted because it was made aware of a proposed development on the hospital campus.

The new development is planned as one of a number of co-located private hospitals intended to be built in the grounds of existing public hospitals under a Government plan announced in 2005. None of the five hospitals has yet been built
.
wearnicehats
Senior Member
 
Posts: 820
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 2:38 pm

Re: ABP allow Chapel at Dublin hospital to be demolished

Postby apelles » Tue Jul 20, 2010 11:45 am

Gunter has previously posted some images of the Chapel in question here.

Image
apelles
 
Posts: 298
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 7:21 pm

Re: ABP allow Chapel at Dublin hospital to be demolished

Postby wearnicehats » Wed Jul 21, 2010 2:11 pm

the usual champions of ABP are being remarkably quiet in this thread
wearnicehats
Senior Member
 
Posts: 820
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 2:38 pm

Re: ABP allow Chapel at Dublin hospital to be demolished

Postby sean blerkin » Wed Jul 21, 2010 2:33 pm

theres loads of stuff like this around. you cant stop all development, if 8 stories can be built here why keep one ruddy small church?
sean blerkin
Member
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 2:44 pm

Re: ABP allow Chapel at Dublin hospital to be demolished

Postby wearnicehats » Wed Jul 21, 2010 2:53 pm

ABP agreed with the LA in that:

the structure is of local interest and value, however, in the context of the subject development, and having regard to the number of similar and higher quality examples of such ecclesiastical architecture in the city, that the removal of the structure was regretfully conceded to. The provision of a major health care facility was considered to outweigh the historical associations attributed to the chapel.

so, as long as there's plenty more like it it's ok. Bet the first guy to shoot a tiger said something similar. It helps, of course, if the developer is in a hospital bed with the HSE - an example of (Syn)crony-ism?

It's precedent now and will likley be used in future provided there is more than one of the same around
wearnicehats
Senior Member
 
Posts: 820
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 2:38 pm

Re: ABP allow Chapel at Dublin hospital to be demolished

Postby gunter » Wed Jul 21, 2010 4:19 pm

Is somebody impersonating . . . hats?

. . . his post have gone from jaded cynicism to constructive scepticism

something's not right
gunter
Old Master
 
Posts: 1923
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 10:33 pm
Location: Dublin

Re: ABP allow Chapel at Dublin hospital to be demolished

Postby rumpelstiltskin » Wed Jul 21, 2010 5:26 pm

Nice to see An Bord Pleanala are capable of a bit of judgement and recognize that a drab, undistinguished piece of architecture does not necessarily merit saving just because it's older than 100 years.
rumpelstiltskin
Member
 
Posts: 234
Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2009 6:51 pm

Re: ABP allow Chapel at Dublin hospital to be demolished

Postby jdivision » Wed Jul 21, 2010 5:34 pm

Wasn't there a proposal to move the chapel elsewhere in teh hospital grounds?
jdivision
Senior Member
 
Posts: 802
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 4:34 pm

Re: ABP allow Chapel at Dublin hospital to be demolished

Postby PVC King » Wed Jul 21, 2010 8:09 pm

wearnicehats wrote:the usual champions of ABP are being remarkably quiet in this thread



It doesn't look like a particularly noteworthy Church to me; noting the absence of comment from the resident board expert it kind of Praxi-teles its own story... :rolleyes:
PVC King
 

Re: ABP allow Chapel at Dublin hospital to be demolished

Postby wearnicehats » Fri Jul 23, 2010 10:08 am

yep - it's toast

http://www.pleanala.ie/casenum/236070.htm

interestingly no mention of the €1million bond bandied about in the papers- presumably covered by this condition

Demolition of the chapel on site shall only be carried out on the commencement
of construction works and the recommendations of the Architectural
Assessment, submitted to the planning authority on 21/12/2009, shall be fully
complied with, to the written satisfaction of the planning authority.


as we all know, however, "commencement" can be the delivery of a site portaloo. The developer seems to have dodged a bullet there


Apparently also "At appeal stage, the Dept. of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government were requested to comment on the development. No response to this request was received."
wearnicehats
Senior Member
 
Posts: 820
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 2:38 pm


Return to Irish Planning Matters



cron