DDDA / Docklands Miscellany

Re: DDDA / Docklands Miscellany

Postby shweeney » Tue May 24, 2011 11:35 am

notice that the high wall along Guild St (on the left of @Telchak's first picture above) has now been removed, opening the dock up to the street.
shweeney
Member
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 3:50 pm

Re: DDDA / Docklands Miscellany

Postby gunter » Thu Jun 02, 2011 11:18 am

Summer's cancelled, we're not getting a Docklands Maritime Festival this year.

In its place, this June bank holiday, there will however be a 'Liffey Swim'.

At this point, I think it's probably safe to conclude that the DDDA have just stopped trying.
gunter
Old Master
 
Posts: 1924
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 10:33 pm
Location: Dublin

Re: DDDA / Docklands Miscellany

Postby StephenC » Thu Jun 02, 2011 2:47 pm

I think its more a case of DDDA have just stop being! The Maritime Festival was a bit shite anyhow...only so much German sausage you can eat.
User avatar
StephenC
Old Master
 
Posts: 2497
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Dublin

Re: DDDA / Docklands Miscellany

Postby gunter » Thu Jun 02, 2011 2:59 pm

Highlight of the year Stephen.

What do you mean there's only so much German sausage you can eat?
gunter
Old Master
 
Posts: 1924
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 10:33 pm
Location: Dublin

Re: DDDA / Docklands Miscellany

Postby Paul Clerkin » Thu Jun 02, 2011 4:48 pm

Are you allowed wash it down with german beer?
User avatar
Paul Clerkin
Old Master
 
Posts: 5427
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 1999 1:00 am
Location: Monaghan

Re: DDDA / Docklands Miscellany

Postby onq » Sat Jun 04, 2011 2:10 pm

The DDDA appear to have been mired in controversy and jaded.

A new broom to sweep clean would be ideal.

And no pensions out of it until 65.

ONQ.

A few references:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U2_Tower

http://www.irishexaminer.com/ireland/idqlgbkfcw/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/infomatique/3807683252/

http://www.thepropertypin.com/viewtopic ... 21&start=0
User avatar
onq
Old Master
 
Posts: 1220
Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 12:29 am
Location: Dublin, Ireland

Re: DDDA / Docklands Miscellany

Postby StephenC » Wed Oct 26, 2011 10:16 am

Little commented on.....

Grand Canal Theatre to be renamed Bord Gais Energy Theatre

Classy
User avatar
StephenC
Old Master
 
Posts: 2497
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Dublin

Re: DDDA / Docklands Miscellany

Postby wearnicehats » Wed Oct 26, 2011 12:06 pm

StephenC wrote:Little commented on.....

Grand Canal Theatre to be renamed Bord Gais Energy Theatre

Classy



NoNoNooooo. Surely the BGET is a subtle homage to the Bard who, in Pericles, wrote

O, come hither,
Thou that beget'st him that did thee beget;
Thou that wast born at sea, buried at Tarsus,
And found at sea again

or maybe it's just a move designed to irritate all Bord Gais customers who have seen their bills increase recently. Great new marketing ploy - "Buy a theatre ticket and we'll reconnect you in time for xmas"
wearnicehats
Senior Member
 
Posts: 822
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 2:38 pm

Re: DDDA / Docklands Miscellany

Postby Telchak » Mon Apr 16, 2012 3:15 pm

Telchak
Member
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2010 10:41 am

Re: DDDA / Docklands Miscellany

Postby StephenC » Fri Jun 01, 2012 10:42 am

Much comment on Twitter about the curious timing of the announcement to wind-down the DDDA. Its a disappointing outcome for an organisation that has achieved a great deal but which is obviously so horribly tainted by the skullduggery of Anglo Irish Bank etc. I thought this was an interesting post from Ireland After NAMA..,

Dublin Docklands Development Authority: A wind-up?

So the government announce this evening that the DDDA is to be wound up after 15 years in operation and that responsibility for the area will be transferred to Dublin City Council, in the person of the Dublin City Manager. How ironic? Twenty five years ago when the CHDDA (the pre-cursor of the DDDA with many of the same personalities involved in the early days) were established, the general discourse, in common with most of the neo-liberal gospel being preached at the time, was that the local authority could not be trusted to do the job and should have power over this area removed from them. While they may not have been particularly efficient in sparking development nor particularly astute with dealing with the private sector, they certainly could not have been accused of the litany of mismanagement that we are now hearing the DDDA were responsible for. Interesting too that we are being told that what happened was due to a lack of ‘corporate governance’ or (Submission by Executive Board to Minister for EHLG, January 2010) rather that anything more sinister that public representatives and agents have been accused of over the last few years.



What is most important is why has it taken so long for action to be taken? Granted Prof Niamh Brennan was appointed as Chair of the Board in March 2009 to deal with some of the problems and reported to Government on them, but the report of the Comptroller and Auditor General and announcement by the Government tonight comes four or five years after a lot of people were questioning what was going on in the Authority? In the late 1990’s, access to any sort of information on the activities of the DDDA – a public agency after all – was almost impossible to come by. In 2008, a number of serious questions in relation to the Authority were raised in my book Dublin Docklands Reinvented (Dublin: Four Courts Press). For example, how could one agency simultaneously act as co-developer and planning authority on the one site (Irish Glass Bottle site)? Could the government not see the potential problems? Highly respected and experienced journalists were also raising these questions and others about the activities of the Authority at the time. For example why did Brian Cowen sanction an increase in the capacity of the authority to borrow even more money when it was obvious that they were stepping way beyond their remit and gambling with the public finances? It is no secrete that along with the issues already in the public domain about the relationship between the DDDA and Anglo-Irish Bank, other projects within the area were also promoted, developed and implemented by an overly tight network of closely connected individuals where there was at the very least serious conflicts of interest.

As I think about my experiences researching the docklands development since the late 1990s, it strikes me that many of the community activists in East Wall and surroundings must be laughing tonight. For years, they have called for greater transparency in the operations of the Authority and when they questioned or objected to particular decisions, they were fobbed off as ‘naysayers’. The Government decision tonight is symbolic because it is the final nail in the coffin to a project that represented the best and worst of the Irish experience over the last decade. While it achieved many good outcomes and radically altered the face of this large part of Dublin City, how ironic that after 25 years, it is the local authority who gets the last laugh!

Niamh Moore

User avatar
StephenC
Old Master
 
Posts: 2497
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Dublin

Barrow Street

Postby StephenC » Thu Aug 16, 2012 12:27 pm

Bit of a revamp of the public realm of Barrow Street proposed...or at least to the area around Google's offices. The rest of the street to be left as a dump.

Pursuant to the requirements of the above, notice is hereby given of the proposed public realm improvements works to Barrow Street for an area extending from the existing railway bridge on Barrow Street to the northern property boundary of Gordon House, Barrow Street, Dublin 2. The proposed works will comprise of the following: - Introduction of traffic calming measures including the closure of a section of Barrow Street beneath the railway bridge to through vehicular traffic. This will be achieved by the provision of removable bollards on both sides of the existing railway bridge allowing pedestrian and cyclist movement only. - Widening of footpaths and provision of improved pedestrian crossing points. - Resurfacing of carriageway and footpaths. - Improvements to the public realm to facilitate the disabled, visually impaired and elderly including the introduction of guidance strips, marked crossings and dished kerbs. - Revised parking, loading bay arrangements and taxi stand facilities. Parking will be removed between the Railway Bridge and Gordon Street resulting in the loss of 25 car parking spaces on Barrow Street. - Provision of new street lighting. - Provision of pavement lighting under the Railway Bridge (a Protected Structure). - Provision of new street furniture including seats and bins etc. - Introduction of new soft landscaping measures including planting and trees. - Provision of appropriate directional signage and markings.


http://www.dublincity.ie/swiftlg/apas/r ... ts%3C/a%3E
User avatar
StephenC
Old Master
 
Posts: 2497
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Dublin

Re: DDDA / Docklands Miscellany

Postby StephenC » Sun Sep 16, 2012 10:47 pm

Proposed layout for Barrow Street. The plan is to close off the street to through-traffic

http://www.dublincity.ie/AnitePublicDocs/00379278.pdf
User avatar
StephenC
Old Master
 
Posts: 2497
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Dublin

Re: DDDA / Docklands Miscellany

Postby gezdub » Mon Sep 17, 2012 7:38 pm

As a resident, I'm predicting traffic chaos if this scheme is implemented.. not an architect, am interested to see the opinions of people better qualified to comment than I am.. If traffic is not allowed under the bridge, what if people getting taxis want to head south? What will happen to the already contentious and volatile taxi rank that currently exists? Was the overhead bridge that Google proposed refused permission, does anyone know?
gezdub
Member
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 6:00 pm

Re: DDDA / Docklands Miscellany

Postby Bago » Mon Sep 17, 2012 10:00 pm

I see admiral William Brown finally got a stone plinth down on sir john rogerson quay, was looking pretty tragic like a toy soldier http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:SEPTE ... 1347347825).jpg
As for the other side of the river, the park along guild street opposite the convention centre, what is with the minimal corporate landscaping in the docklands. Ok so the funding must have been pulled on the competition held for this space but this must be possibly the most banal misuse of open space in the city centre, acres of grass and trees spaced so far they fade into nothing, not sure they'll even mature into anything significant, i would have suggested something more maritime like a double avenue of pines. For a few euro more this could have been much nicer.
Bago
Member
 
Posts: 116
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 4:04 pm
Location: Dublin

Re: DDDA / Docklands Miscellany

Postby StephenC » Mon Sep 17, 2012 10:28 pm

Hilariously...an article in the Northside People last week included a picture of the Lord Mayor and a young girl at the William Brown statues. The caption says "Legend has it that rubbing the foot of the Admiral wards off sea sickness" Aaahargh me hearties!
User avatar
StephenC
Old Master
 
Posts: 2497
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Dublin

Re: DDDA / Docklands Miscellany

Postby StephenC » Mon Sep 17, 2012 10:37 pm

gezdub wrote:As a resident, I'm predicting traffic chaos if this scheme is implemented.. not an architect, am interested to see the opinions of people better qualified to comment than I am.. If traffic is not allowed under the bridge, what if people getting taxis want to head south? What will happen to the already contentious and volatile taxi rank that currently exists? Was the overhead bridge that Google proposed refused permission, does anyone know?


Don't know enough about traffic in the area to comment but I did wonder at the scheme when I saw it. Its must surely add traffic to adjoining residential streets. Its also refurbishing one end of the street while the other remains a dump - is that really fair. Surely Google's purse (and I imagine they are paying for this) could extend to the rest of the street. Lets just get it done!

From reading the plans the proposed three-way link bridge appears to be considered. I cant find the exact planning applications to confirm it...I haven't the patience to read through the various applications listed.

Did you comment on the application gezdub....you should do. Its a completely pointless waste of time with DCC-originating applications if Grafton Street/Mountjoy Square/Thomas Street QBC/etc etc are to go by. :-)
User avatar
StephenC
Old Master
 
Posts: 2497
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Dublin

Previous

Return to Ireland