Hotel planned for gasometer site

Re: Hotel planned for gasometer site

Postby jdivision » Tue Jan 15, 2008 5:54 pm

The vote has no standing. More inaccurate rubbish from The Irish Times, similar to their coverage of the Berkeley Court/Jurys Ballsbridge sites. They even admit that it's a vote that has no meaning:

"councillors have recommended that the city planners refuse permission to Mr Carroll for the change to the hotel and for the extension to the Google building"
jdivision
Senior Member
 
Posts: 802
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 4:34 pm

Re: Hotel planned for gasometer site

Postby CC105 » Tue Jan 15, 2008 7:59 pm

Typical left wing shite, same bunch of muppets that were banging the drum against Jurys and it seems any development in the area, The google building is one minute from the dart so this part at least must be viewed as positive. Some of the existing apartments in the complex are already in shadow so that should not be too big an issue to deal with.
CC105
Member
 
Posts: 115
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:41 pm

Re: Hotel planned for gasometer site

Postby alonso » Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:14 pm

"This is an ill-conceived, ill-thought-out, cheap attempt to make a big profit, which is not in the interest of the local residents, not in the interest of the city and not in the interest of planning," Mr Lacey said.

I can confirm that Cllr Lacey is in favour however of the Clarence redevelopment. And he;s one of the good ones, I believe. It seems councillors, even in Dublin City, are more concerned with grandstanding against developers rather than engage in any sort of rational planning. Like it's been said, there are pros and cons, but with the Burlo closing and Jurys et al about to go for years, maybe D4 could take it. NoG must be apofuckingplectic. Never mind that Doolan fella - he;s off his head.
alonso
Senior Member
 
Posts: 975
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 9:33 pm

Re: Hotel planned for gasometer site

Postby publicrealm » Tue Jan 15, 2008 11:28 pm

manifesta wrote:Maybe it's pining for the fjords?


Naw, it's just been stunned (by the prices):D
publicrealm
Member
 
Posts: 284
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 12:50 am
Location: D6

Re: Hotel planned for gasometer site

Postby PoxyShamrock » Wed Jan 16, 2008 6:41 pm

What will the developers do with the current apartment owners?
PoxyShamrock
Member
 
Posts: 99
Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 2:10 am
Location: Limerick City

Re: Hotel planned for gasometer site

Postby sw101 » Wed Jan 16, 2008 6:57 pm

PoxyShamrock wrote:What will the developers do with the current apartment owners?


there are none. some deposits were taken and subsequently returned.
sw101
 
Posts: 874
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2003 3:01 pm

Re: Hotel planned for gasometer site

Postby paul_moloney » Mon Jan 18, 2010 8:31 pm

Paul Clerkin wrote:In relation to Google, "moral blackmail" had been employed to suggest that refusing planning permission for the extension would result in a loss of jobs.

"My information is that Google neither requested nor wants the additional floor space, but because of a flaw in the lease, Fabrizia is forcing Google to take the additional floor space."


Payback is a bitch, Liam:

http://www.tribune.ie/business/news/article/2010/jan/17/google-set-to-dump-carroll-for-new-hq/

Developer Liam Carroll's Zoe Group, which is in receivership, is set to lose Google as a tenant.

The internet search engine giant, which employs 1,500 people in Dublin, wants to purchase 200,000sq ft of office space in the city centre and has tasked Peter Stapleton of property advisers Lisney to find an appropriate headquarters.


P.
paul_moloney
 
Posts: 40
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 1:38 pm

Previous

Return to Ireland



cron