|
|
#26 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 794
|
Re: IMMA / RHK Dublin
What art? (Couldn't help myself!)
I hope the original doors haven't ended up in a skip, before they're ordered to be reinstated. If they have, then the DCC paddy-wagons should be sirening their way along to Kilmainham. The one thing you can say about arts administration/management is that it doesn't exist; this will have been a panic reaction by one permanently near-hysterical 'administrator' whose idea of 'heritage' goes back no further than the last panic. What's a pair of 17thC doors? This is for CONTEMPORARY arts! The only things (apart from the complex irtself) worth seeing are the former chapel and the dining hall, and they're normally kept locked; shame that's where the art is. Last edited by johnglas; 3rd November 2009 at 01:27 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Dublin
Posts: 1,610
|
Re: IMMA / RHK Dublin
Its worth stating that the "original" doors may actually NOT be 17thC or whatever but could well have been put up in 1982. In fact they look pretty mundane. Notwithstanding that, aluminium! Are they for real!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Archiseek.com
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Monaghan
Posts: 4,819
|
Re: IMMA / RHK Dublin
Quote:
exactly stephen it's highly unlikely they are original in the true sense of the word - but the new additions are quite crude |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dublin
Posts: 1,252
|
Re: IMMA / RHK Dublin
Quote:
![]() As for visitor numbers and catching gunter on video tape, . . . . . shouldn't be too difficult, I'd be the one there! IMMA-haters! ! come on now foremanjoe, that's a bit immature. Nobody around here hates IMMA, it's more a matter of pity and anyway the real villains of the piece are not IMMA, but the OPW. They're the one that creamed off the windfall profits from the sale of the former RHK lands on Military Road (in partnership with Eircom) without ploughing anything back into Kilmainham, they're the ones that put in the vast surface carpark at the RHK using the blatant lie that the visitor numbers required it, and they're the ones that now lease half the carpark, on a nod and a wink basis, to their buddies in Eircom, whose brand new office block seems to be about 200 car park spaces short of the level of demand etc. etc. For the record, I was minding my own business (more or less) when I, unexpectedly, encountered your appalling aluminium doors. Don't know for sure, but they were heavy timber doors and they had lots of metal studs and brackets holding them together, which would suggest that they've been there a long time. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 89
|
Re: IMMA / RHK Dublin
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Ireland
Posts: 4,192
|
Re: IMMA / RHK Dublin
Nothing surprises me anymore. What on earth is going on? We all know Kilmainham is a world unto itself out there in the wilds (
), but even by its wayward standards this development takes the biscuit. I can't imagine that anything other than heavy-handed security is dictating these events. Surely fire standards do not require measures of this calibre for external doors? (and for which, in any event, Protected Structures are exempt). In hindsight, the doors were installed in the south range earlier in the year, but those hideous setts proved too much of a distraction at the time to notice. For fear of a clout from foremanjoe, I shall say no more on the matter, only than at the launch of John McCullen's new book on the Park, held in RHK last week, there was universal agreement as to just how disagreeable they are. ![]() The same smart paths could easily have been laid across a compacted earth and gravel surface. ![]() William Robinson's calp and sandstone arcades are one of the express survivors of the original 17th century exterior fabric. ![]() ![]() ![]() Only a fragment of its closest equivalent survives at Dublin Castle. In this case, the calp and sandstone arcade of the Upper Yard's south-western range (as also modified by Master of The Infill, Francis Johnston), was in effect designed by William Robinson, but in reality executed by Thomas Burgh as his successor as Surveyor General in 1712. ![]() Conversely, what parts that were built by Robinson no longer survive, so we must look to the Royal Hospital for the genuine article. |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,121
|
Re: IMMA / RHK Dublin
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dublin
Posts: 1,252
|
Re: IMMA / RHK Dublin
Magnificent photographs Graham, as always.
You're never sure with IMMA whether the irony is intentional. Going to a museum to see the cobblestones lifted from actual Dublin streets is a case in point. Thanks to foremanjoe's paranoia about archiseekers showing up at IMMA and not carrying themselves with the appropriate level of deference, we got no advance notice of an event there on 7 November, with the pertinent title of ''What is modern art?'' So near, and yet so far ![]() Still, you miss one bus and another one comes along. Public Forum on Amalgamation What do we think? Is an amalgamation the way to go? The Crawford has the location, the National Gallery has the pictures, and IMMA has the car park . . . . it could work ![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| "Redesigning Dublin" - Chief City Planner Dick Gleeson's vision for Dublin | hutton | Dublin | 24 | 1st March 2007 06:24 PM |
| Anglo-Saxon (!!) Dublin | Shane | Dublin | 4 | 21st December 2005 03:50 PM |
| Architectural Competition for Landmark Tower / U2 Studio, Britain Quay, Dublin | Paul Clerkin | World Architecture | 0 | 21st November 2002 11:07 AM |
| Office blocks @ Kilmainham Gaol & Royal Hospital | John Callery | Ireland | 53 | 25th March 2002 09:50 AM |
| design/detailing/community impact of modern Dublin apartment complexes | Paul Clerkin | Dublin | 0 | 16th July 2001 03:16 PM |